PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEQ vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABEQ vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABEQ vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
5.30%15.32%12.68%4.63%-1.00%12.49%2.51%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
13.21%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return.


ABEQ

1D
0.69%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
5.30%
6M
5.28%
1Y
12.19%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*

GCOW

1D
0.85%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
13.21%
6M
20.65%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABEQ vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABEQGCOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

2.27

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

3.01

-1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.77

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.23

14.12

-7.89

ABEQ vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and GCOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABEQGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.27

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

1.02

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.60

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and GCOW is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ABEQ vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than GCOW's 4.39% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.19%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.39%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and GCOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEQGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-37.64%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-11.05%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-21.48%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.77%

-1.84%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-5.90%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.17%

-0.06%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 2.82%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABEQGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

4.03%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

7.90%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

13.89%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

13.48%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.99%

16.25%

-2.26%