PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEQ vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
5.41%15.32%12.68%4.63%-1.00%12.49%2.51%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-5.76%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%109.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -5.76% return.


ABEQ

1D
0.11%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
5.41%
6M
5.95%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
0.77%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
-5.76%
6M
-6.13%
1Y
59.59%
3Y*
85.01%
5Y*
66.40%
10Y*
69.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABEQNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.45

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

2.14

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.08

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.76

7.73

-1.97

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABEQNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.45

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

1.29

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.61

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and NVDA is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.18%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEQNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-89.72%

+61.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-20.21%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-66.34%

+49.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-15.10%

+9.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-36.40%

+32.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

8.05%

-5.91%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 2.46%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABEQNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

10.43%

-7.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

25.79%

-18.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

41.42%

-29.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

51.72%

-40.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

49.84%

-35.86%