ABEQ vs. NVDA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Absolute Investment Advisers, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ABEQ returned 8.42%/yr vs 59.20%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.93% return.

ABEQ

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.30%
• 6M: 2.94%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.10%

NVDA

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: 6.06%
• 6M: 11.47%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 66.72%
• 5Y*: 59.20%
• 10Y*: 64.47%
• ALL TIME*: 36.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	$447.80K	$487.79K	$489.86K
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	$26.31B	$26.07B	$32.04B

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	7.54%	15.32%	12.68%	4.63%	-1.00%	12.49%	2.14%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	10.93%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	110.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and NVDA is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020	0.23

The correlation between ABEQ and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABEQ

ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 53
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 61
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABEQ	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.53	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	0.97	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.11	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	0.95	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.43	1.93	+1.51

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABEQ	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.82%	-89.72%	+61.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-20.21%	+12.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.95%	-36.88%	+28.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.26%	-66.34%	+49.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.76%	-12.24%	+8.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-36.07%	+31.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	9.93%	-5.95%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 2.78%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.25%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABEQ	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	12.25%	-9.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.52%	28.43%	-21.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.12%	36.50%	-27.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.78%	51.91%	-41.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	49.97%	-36.22%

Dividends

ABEQ vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	1.18%	1.25%	1.48%	2.60%	1.20%	0.60%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABEQ and NVDA in my portfolio?

ABEQ and NVDA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABEQ or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to ABEQ (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEQ dropped -27.82% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.