ABEQ vs. EQRR
ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABEQ is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Absolute Investment Advisers LLC, while EQRR is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. ABEQ is actively managed, while EQRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ABEQ returned 7.17%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for EQRR. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABEQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 28.07% return.
ABEQ
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 3.70%
- 1Y
- 9.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
EQRR
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 9.12%
- YTD
- 28.07%
- 6M
- 29.12%
- 1Y
- 44.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 3.63% | 15.32% | 12.68% | 4.63% | -1.00% | 12.49% | 2.51% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 28.07% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -8.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABEQ and EQRR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ABEQ and EQRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ABEQ
EQRR
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
ABEQ
EQRR
Basic Materials
ABEQ
EQRR
-
Consumer Defensive
ABEQ
EQRR
-
Energy
ABEQ
EQRR
Industrials
ABEQ
EQRR
Healthcare
ABEQ
EQRR
-
Technology
ABEQ
EQRR
Communication Services
ABEQ
EQRR
Utilities
ABEQ
EQRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
ABEQ
-
EQRR
Real Estate
ABEQ
-
EQRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABEQ vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
ABEQ
EQRR
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABEQ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 3.29 | -2.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 4.30 | -2.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.59 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 9.04 | -7.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 33.66 | -30.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABEQ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 3.29 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.58 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.43 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABEQ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -57.93% | +30.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -4.95% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.95% | -17.75% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -21.75% | +4.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | 0.00% | -7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -10.08% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 1.33% | +1.83% |
Volatility
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 2.17%, while ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABEQ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 4.61% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.72% | 10.32% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.93% | 13.49% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.81% | 21.38% | -10.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 24.87% | -11.02% |
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABEQ vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, which matches EQRR's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 1.20% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 2.60% | 1.20% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABEQ and EQRR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to ABEQ (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEQ dropped -27.82% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.35% vs 7.17% for ABEQ. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ABEQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.
ABEQ and EQRR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.20%.
ABEQ is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EQRR is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 0.35% for EQRR.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABEQ and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer