PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEQ vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABEQ vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and The Unilever Group (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABEQ vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
5.41%15.32%12.68%4.63%-1.00%12.49%2.51%
UL
The Unilever Group
-13.63%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%8.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -13.63% return.


ABEQ

1D
0.11%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
5.41%
6M
5.95%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*

UL

1D
-1.60%
1M
-21.57%
YTD
-13.63%
6M
-13.96%
1Y
-13.61%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABEQULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

-0.63

+1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

-0.75

+2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.90

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

-0.56

+2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.76

-1.78

+7.54

ABEQ vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEQ and UL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABEQULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

-0.63

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.06

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.39

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and UL is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ABEQ vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than UL's 4.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.18%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UL
The Unilever Group
4.14%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum UL drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and UL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEQULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-53.55%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-24.27%

+16.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-26.59%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-24.27%

+18.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-10.55%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

7.63%

-5.49%

Volatility

ABEQ vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is 2.46%, while The Unilever Group (UL) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that ABEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABEQULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

7.63%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

16.70%

-9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

21.59%

-10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

20.53%

-9.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

21.48%

-7.50%