AAPB vs. PLTM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM).

AAPB and PLTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAPB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. PLTM is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.

Performance

AAPB vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AAPB vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	-15.83%	-0.93%	47.02%	77.21%	-38.44%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-4.16%	124.46%	-8.91%	-8.10%	14.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -4.16% return.

AAPB

• 1D: 5.22%
• 1M: -8.53%
• YTD: -15.83%
• 6M: -5.94%
• 1Y: 10.00%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -16.88%
• YTD: -4.16%
• 6M: 25.15%
• 1Y: 95.35%
• 3Y*: 24.98%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPB vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

AAPB

GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF

PLTM

GraniteShares Platinum Trust

Return for Risk

AAPB vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPB

AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 21
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 86
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPB vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPB	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.92	-1.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	2.18	-1.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.33	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	2.85	-2.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	8.61	-7.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAPB vs. PLTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the PLTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and PLTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPB	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	1.92	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.27	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and PLTM is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AAPB vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	5.22%	4.39%	0.00%	18.75%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPB	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.13%	-42.32%	-15.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.56%	-34.52%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.36%	-29.20%	+4.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.83%	-18.35%	-1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.81%	11.43%	+5.38%

Volatility

AAPB vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 10.86%, while GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a volatility of 16.47%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPB	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.86%	16.47%	-5.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.34%	45.52%	-15.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.90%	49.91%	+12.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.57%	32.39%	+19.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.57%	30.82%	+20.75%