AAPB vs. NVDL
AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPB returned 17.03%/yr vs 92.63%/yr for NVDL. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.
Performance
AAPB vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's 2.41% return.
AAPB
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -9.88%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 10.46%
- 1Y
- 90.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL
- 1D
- -8.23%
- 1M
- -15.60%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 52.74%
- 3Y*
- 92.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPB vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 10.97% | -0.93% | 47.02% | 77.21% | -18.15% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 2.41% | 32.57% | 344.58% | 432.18% | -28.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPB and NVDL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022 | 0.32 |
The correlation between AAPB and NVDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AAPB vs. NVDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAPB
NVDL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AAPB
NVDL
Basic Materials
AAPB
-
NVDL
Communication Services
AAPB
-
NVDL
Consumer Cyclical
AAPB
-
NVDL
Consumer Defensive
AAPB
-
NVDL
Energy
AAPB
-
NVDL
Financial Services
AAPB
-
NVDL
Healthcare
AAPB
-
NVDL
Industrials
AAPB
-
NVDL
Real Estate
AAPB
-
NVDL
Utilities
AAPB
-
NVDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPB vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank
AAPB
NVDL
AAPB vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPB | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 1.25 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 2.75 | +4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPB vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and NVDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPB | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -67.55% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.11% | -42.23% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.13% | -67.55% | +9.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.26% | -30.16% | +16.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -17.07% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.89% | 19.22% | -7.33% |
Volatility
AAPB vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 14.32%, while GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a volatility of 26.32%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPB | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 26.32% | -12.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 53.60% | -20.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.34% | 70.66% | -25.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.27% | 90.42% | -39.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.27% | 90.42% | -39.15% |
AAPB vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPB vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison
AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.96% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPB and NVDL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDL has higher volatility (26.32%) compared to AAPB (14.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs NVDL's -67.55%.
On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 92.63% vs 17.03% for AAPB. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 14.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 92.63% return vs 17.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AAPB.
AAPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 1.05% for NVDL.
AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPB and NVDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer