AAPB vs. FNGU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AAPB is actively managed, while FNGU is passively managed. Over the past year, AAPB returned 103.83% vs 13.50% for FNGU. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

AAPB vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 18.01% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 5.54% return.

AAPB

• 1D: -15.09%
• 1M: -1.80%
• 6M: 30.60%
• YTD: 18.01%
• 1Y: 103.83%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.06%

FNGU

• 1D: 5.13%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 18.28%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 1Y: 13.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	$4.41M	$3.60M	$2.76M
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	$92.08M	$119.18M	$153.90M

AAPB vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	18.01%	5.64%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	5.54%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and FNGU is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.37

AAPB vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAPB	FNGU
Technology	66.7%	60.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	29.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AAPB vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPB

AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 74
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 14
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPB vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPB	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	0.07	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	0.56	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.07	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	0.07	+3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.44	0.16	+7.28

AAPB vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPB	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.13%	-61.30%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.11%	-59.55%	+31.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.24%	-26.25%	+8.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.89%	-22.61%	+3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.28%	26.68%	-14.40%

Volatility

AAPB vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) has a higher volatility of 23.72% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) at 17.87%. This indicates that AAPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPB	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.72%	17.87%	+5.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.66%	53.81%	-11.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.62%	65.86%	-13.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.51%	79.67%	-27.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.51%	79.67%	-27.16%

AAPB vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPB vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	3.72%	4.39%	0.00%	18.75%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPB and FNGU in my portfolio?

AAPB and FNGU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPB or FNGU?

AAPB has higher volatility (23.72%) compared to FNGU (17.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, AAPB or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, AAPB leads with 103.83% vs 13.50% for FNGU. On fees, AAPB is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, FNGU has been the lower-risk option at 17.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPB or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 103.83% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPB or FNGU?

AAPB is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPB or FNGU?

AAPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between AAPB and FNGU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.