PortfoliosLab logo
AAPB vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and FNGU is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AAPB vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.47%
331.42%
AAPB
FNGU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AAPB:

-0.04

FNGU:

0.33

Sortino Ratio

AAPB:

0.42

FNGU:

1.14

Omega Ratio

AAPB:

1.06

FNGU:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

AAPB:

-0.02

FNGU:

0.56

Martin Ratio

AAPB:

-0.06

FNGU:

1.34

Ulcer Index

AAPB:

19.61%

FNGU:

26.37%

Daily Std Dev

AAPB:

64.22%

FNGU:

93.41%

Max Drawdown

AAPB:

-58.13%

FNGU:

-92.34%

Current Drawdown

AAPB:

-47.39%

FNGU:

-37.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a -43.56% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's -25.93% return.


AAPB

YTD

-43.56%

1M

25.64%

6M

-32.51%

1Y

-2.46%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNGU

YTD

-25.93%

1M

67.17%

6M

-17.38%

1Y

30.52%

5Y*

44.85%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPB vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AAPB vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPB is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPB is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPB is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPB is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPB is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPB is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AAPB vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.04
0.33
AAPB
FNGU

Dividends

AAPB vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither AAPB nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

AAPB vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-47.39%
-37.80%
AAPB
FNGU

Volatility

AAPB vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 33.86%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
33.86%
43.48%
AAPB
FNGU