PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPB vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPB vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 9.45% return.


AAPB

1D
-0.89%
1M
-8.42%
YTD
12.76%
6M
13.63%
1Y
94.57%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
10Y*

AAPL

1D
-0.34%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.81%
1Y
48.35%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
30.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPB vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
12.76%-0.93%47.02%77.21%-38.60%
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.45%9.05%30.71%49.01%-21.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and AAPL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

1.00

The correlation between AAPB and AAPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPB vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPB
AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPB vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPBAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.52

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

8.68

-0.68

AAPB vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPBAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.13%

-81.80%

+23.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.11%

-13.80%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.13%

-33.36%

-24.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

-5.77%

-6.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.24%

-29.58%

+10.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.86%

5.59%

+6.27%

Volatility

AAPB vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 7.01%. This indicates that AAPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPBAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

7.01%

+7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.41%

16.59%

+16.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.39%

22.59%

+22.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.29%

27.52%

+23.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.29%

28.94%

+22.35%

Dividends

AAPB vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
3.90%4.39%0.00%18.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, AAPB and AAPL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAPB has higher volatility (14.43%) compared to AAPL (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPB and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer