PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^TNX vs. RYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^TNX vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.78%
7.99%
^TNX
RYLD

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 10.29% return.


^TNX

YTD

14.64%

1M

5.42%

6M

-0.96%

1Y

0.36%

5Y (annualized)

20.17%

10Y (annualized)

6.76%

RYLD

YTD

10.29%

1M

3.33%

6M

8.79%

1Y

13.01%

5Y (annualized)

3.58%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


^TNXRYLD
Sharpe Ratio0.011.31
Sortino Ratio0.191.89
Omega Ratio1.021.26
Calmar Ratio0.010.75
Martin Ratio0.037.85
Ulcer Index11.03%1.70%
Daily Std Dev22.96%10.18%
Max Drawdown-93.78%-41.52%
Current Drawdown-44.76%-6.54%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between ^TNX and RYLD is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

^TNX vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.000.011.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.191.89
The chart of Omega ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.801.001.201.401.601.021.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.010.75
The chart of Martin ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.037.85
^TNX
RYLD

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.01
1.31
^TNX
RYLD

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -93.78%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.15%
-6.54%
^TNX
RYLD

Volatility

^TNX vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 3.68%. This indicates that ^TNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.75%
3.68%
^TNX
RYLD