PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^TNX vs. RYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^TNX and RYLD is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

^TNX vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.01%
6.29%
^TNX
RYLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^TNX:

0.85

RYLD:

0.98

Sortino Ratio

^TNX:

1.39

RYLD:

1.40

Omega Ratio

^TNX:

1.15

RYLD:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

^TNX:

0.34

RYLD:

0.58

Martin Ratio

^TNX:

1.83

RYLD:

6.16

Ulcer Index

^TNX:

10.32%

RYLD:

1.66%

Daily Std Dev

^TNX:

22.08%

RYLD:

10.49%

Max Drawdown

^TNX:

-93.78%

RYLD:

-41.53%

Current Drawdown

^TNX:

-40.47%

RYLD:

-7.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's -0.67% return.


^TNX

YTD

4.44%

1M

10.45%

6M

14.01%

1Y

20.91%

5Y*

21.00%

10Y*

10.07%

RYLD

YTD

-0.67%

1M

-2.18%

6M

6.29%

1Y

10.71%

5Y*

2.93%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^TNX vs. RYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^TNX is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^TNX is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYLD is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYLD is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYLD is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYLD is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYLD is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYLD is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^TNX vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.500.850.98
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.001.391.40
The chart of Omega ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.901.001.101.201.301.401.151.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.000.690.58
The chart of Martin ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.836.16
^TNX
RYLD

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.85
0.98
^TNX
RYLD

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -93.78%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.25%
-7.30%
^TNX
RYLD

Volatility

^TNX vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 3.92%. This indicates that ^TNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.61%
3.92%
^TNX
RYLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab