^IXIC vs. ^NYA
^IXIC (NASDAQ Composite) and ^NYA (NYSE Composite) are both indexes. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC returned 17.32%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for ^NYA. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
^IXIC vs. ^NYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ^IXIC having a 9.17% return and ^NYA slightly higher at 9.56%. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has outperformed ^NYA with an annualized return of 17.32%, while ^NYA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.50% annualized return.
^IXIC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.49%
^NYA
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 18.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | $206.58T | $204.81T | $251.66T |
^NYA NYSE Composite | $114.19T | $116.44T | $129.51T |
^IXIC vs. ^NYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | 9.17% | 20.36% | 28.64% | 43.42% | -33.10% | 21.39% | 43.64% | 35.23% | -3.88% | 28.24% |
^NYA NYSE Composite | 9.56% | 15.22% | 13.32% | 10.99% | -11.53% | 18.17% | 4.40% | 22.32% | -11.20% | 15.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^IXIC and ^NYA is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 1971 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ^IXIC and ^NYA has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^IXIC vs. ^NYA — Risk / Return Rank
^IXIC
^NYA
^IXIC vs. ^NYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and NYSE Composite (^NYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^IXIC | ^NYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.17 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 8.18 | -3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^IXIC vs. ^NYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, which is greater than ^NYA's maximum drawdown of -59.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and ^NYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^IXIC | ^NYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.93% | -59.01% | -18.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -8.26% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.32% | -15.21% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.40% | -22.37% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.40% | -38.11% | +1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -0.50% | -5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.35% | -9.83% | -11.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.19% | +1.79% |
Volatility
^IXIC vs. ^NYA - Volatility Comparison
NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to NYSE Composite (^NYA) at 2.65%. This indicates that ^IXIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^IXIC | ^NYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 2.65% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.70% | 8.76% | +5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.43% | 11.22% | +7.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 14.81% | +7.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 16.81% | +5.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^IXIC and ^NYA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^IXIC has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to ^NYA (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IXIC dropped -77.93% vs ^NYA's -59.01%.
^NYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^IXIC and ^NYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer