^IXIC vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.21%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXIC and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ) have volatilities of 7.89% and 7.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.