^IXIC vs. ^NDX
^IXIC (NASDAQ Composite) and ^NDX (NASDAQ 100 Index) are both indexes. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC returned 18.32%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for ^NDX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.
Performance
^IXIC vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 18.32%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.
^IXIC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
^NDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
^IXIC vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | 11.96% | 20.36% | 28.64% | 43.42% | -33.10% | 21.39% | 43.64% | 35.23% | -3.88% | 28.24% |
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 17.51% | 20.17% | 24.88% | 53.81% | -32.97% | 26.63% | 47.58% | 37.96% | -1.04% | 31.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^IXIC and ^NDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1985 | 0.97 |
The correlation between ^IXIC and ^NDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^IXIC vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank
^IXIC
^NDX
^IXIC vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^IXIC | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.03 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | 11.22 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^IXIC vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and ^NDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^IXIC | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.93% | -82.90% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -12.12% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.32% | -22.93% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.40% | -35.56% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.40% | -35.56% | -0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | -3.23% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.39% | -24.60% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.27% | +0.23% |
Volatility
^IXIC vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) is 7.12%, while NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that ^IXIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^IXIC | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 8.17% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 14.16% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 17.55% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 22.81% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 22.64% | -0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ^IXIC and ^NDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
^NDX has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to ^IXIC (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IXIC dropped -77.93% vs ^NDX's -82.90%.
^NDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^IXIC and ^NDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer