^IXIC vs. ONEQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ).

ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003.

Performance

^IXIC vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^IXIC vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite	-6.03%	20.36%	28.64%	43.42%	-33.10%	21.39%	43.64%	35.23%	-3.88%	28.24%
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock	-5.66%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's -5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 16.09%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.32% annualized return.

^IXIC

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: -6.03%
• 6M: -4.02%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: 16.09%

ONEQ

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -3.69%
• YTD: -5.66%
• 6M: -3.52%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 22.37%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 17.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^IXIC vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IXIC

^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 78
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^IXIC vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^IXIC	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.14	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.75	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	2.08	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.07	7.64	-0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^IXIC vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXIC and ONEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^IXIC	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	1.14	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.51	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.80	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.61	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ^IXIC and ONEQ is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

^IXIC vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	^IXIC	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.93%	-55.09%	-22.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.26%	-13.13%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.40%	-35.23%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.40%	-35.23%	-1.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.84%	-8.26%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.46%	-8.01%	-13.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	3.57%	+0.14%

Volatility

^IXIC vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) have volatilities of 7.06% and 7.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^IXIC	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.06%	7.03%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	12.96%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.33%	23.24%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.44%	22.16%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.97%	21.67%	+0.30%