PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NYA vs. BRK-A
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NYA vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite (^NYA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^NYA vs. BRK-A - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NYA
NYSE Composite
0.86%15.22%13.32%10.99%-11.53%18.17%4.40%22.32%-11.20%15.84%
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
-5.10%10.85%25.49%15.77%4.00%29.57%2.42%10.98%2.82%21.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYA achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-A's -5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYA has underperformed BRK-A with an annualized return of 8.10%, while BRK-A has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.


^NYA

1D
0.06%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
0.86%
6M
2.71%
1Y
13.62%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
8.10%

BRK-A

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-5.10%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
-11.20%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NYA vs. BRK-A — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NYA
^NYA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
^NYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-A
BRK-A Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BRK-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-A Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-A Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NYA vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite (^NYA) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^NYABRK-ADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

-0.64

+1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

-0.76

+2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.90

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

-0.73

+1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.33

-1.21

+6.54

^NYA vs. BRK-A - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NYA Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the BRK-A Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYA and BRK-A, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^NYABRK-ADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

-0.64

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.68

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.82

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYA and BRK-A is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^NYA vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYA drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, which is greater than BRK-A's maximum drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYA and BRK-A.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^NYABRK-ADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.01%

-51.47%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-14.43%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-25.98%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-30.43%

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-11.50%

+5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-9.51%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

8.69%

-5.99%

Volatility

^NYA vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison

NYSE Composite (^NYA) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A) at 4.04%. This indicates that ^NYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^NYABRK-ADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.04%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

10.99%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

17.63%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

17.25%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

18.98%

-2.09%