PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NYA vs. WTKWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NYA vs. WTKWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite (^NYA) and Wolters Kluwer NV (WTKWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYA achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than WTKWY's -29.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYA has outperformed WTKWY with an annualized return of 8.29%, while WTKWY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.62% annualized return.


^NYA

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.27%
6M
5.29%
YTD
8.60%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
8.29%

WTKWY

1D
2.68%
1M
1.09%
6M
-31.02%
YTD
-29.43%
1Y
-54.60%
3Y*
-15.85%
5Y*
-6.16%
10Y*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NYA vs. WTKWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NYA
NYSE Composite
8.60%15.22%13.32%10.99%-11.53%18.17%4.40%22.32%-11.20%15.84%
WTKWY
Wolters Kluwer NV
-29.43%-36.20%17.53%36.95%-9.84%43.14%17.24%25.81%14.47%48.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYA and WTKWY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between ^NYA and WTKWY has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NYA vs. WTKWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NYA
^NYA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
^NYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

WTKWY
WTKWY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
WTKWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTKWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTKWY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WTKWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTKWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NYA vs. WTKWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite (^NYA) and Wolters Kluwer NV (WTKWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NYAWTKWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.70

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

-0.91

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

-1.33

+8.67

^NYA vs. WTKWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the WTKWY Sharpe Ratio of -1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYA and WTKWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NYA vs. WTKWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYA drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, smaller than the maximum WTKWY drawdown of -65.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYA and WTKWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NYAWTKWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.01%

-65.12%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-59.98%

+51.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.21%

-65.12%

+49.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-65.12%

+42.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-65.12%

+27.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-60.74%

+60.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-16.66%

+6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

41.03%

-38.80%

Volatility

^NYA vs. WTKWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Composite (^NYA) is 2.65%, while Wolters Kluwer NV (WTKWY) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that ^NYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTKWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NYAWTKWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

8.54%

-5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

29.70%

-20.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

36.29%

-25.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

26.17%

-11.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

23.71%

-6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NYA and WTKWY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTKWY has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to ^NYA (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NYA dropped -59.01% vs WTKWY's -65.12%.

^NYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NYA and WTKWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer