PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NYA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NYA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite (^NYA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYA achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYA has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 8.44%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.29% annualized return.


^NYA

1D
0.61%
1M
1.25%
6M
5.99%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
8.44%
ALL TIME*
6.92%

^GSPC

1D
1.48%
1M
1.57%
6M
8.95%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.29%
ALL TIME*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.00T$37.50T$41.55T
$114.99T$116.40T$129.81T

^NYA vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NYA
NYSE Composite
10.23%15.22%13.32%10.99%-11.53%18.17%4.40%22.32%-11.20%15.84%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.03%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYA and ^GSPC is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1970

0.96

Over the past year, the correlation between ^NYA and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.76 - well below their long-term average of 0.96, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NYA vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

^NYA
^NYA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
^NYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

^NYA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite (^NYA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NYA^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.41

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

10.22

-1.20

^NYA vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYA and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NYA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYA drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYA and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NYA^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.01%

-56.78%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-9.10%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.21%

-18.90%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-25.43%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-33.92%

-4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-10.70%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.14%

+0.05%

Volatility

^NYA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Composite (^NYA) is 2.56%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that ^NYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NYA^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

3.80%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

10.20%

-1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

12.86%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

17.02%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

18.08%

-1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NYA and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to ^NYA (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NYA dropped -59.01% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^NYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NYA and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer