PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the Mid Cap Blend Equities category. Below you'll find alternative ETFs from the same category, ranked by key criteria, plus funds that investors commonly compare with CZA. Use the tables to find lower-cost options, better risk-adjusted returns, or a closer substitute for your current allocation.

Cheapest Alternatives to CZA

CZA charges 0.69% annually. There are 65 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with lower expense ratios, going as low as 0.03%.


Best Risk-Adjusted Alternatives to CZA

CZA has a PortfoliosLab risk / return rank of 30. There are 59 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with higher risk-adjusted ranks, going as high as 92.


Top Performing CZA Alternatives (YTD)

CZA is at 5.97% YTD. There are 67 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with higher YTD returns, going as high as 39.67%.


Lowest Volatility Alternatives to CZA

CZA has 12.78% 1-year volatility. There are 18 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with lower 1-year volatility, going as low as 8.80%.


Lowest Drawdown Alternatives to CZA

CZA has a 1-year max drawdown of -9.21%. There are 40 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with shallower 1-year drawdowns, going as shallow as -6.00%.


Other ETFs from Invesco

The 10 most viewed Invesco ETFs shown here include QQQ, SPMO, QQQM and span 10 categories. AUM among these funds goes as high as $494B.


Often Compared With CZA

Investors most often compare CZA with FMDE, YAFFX, FKUTX. These 19 comparison targets span 11 categories, based on PortfoliosLab usage data.


SymbolNameCategoryRisk / Return RankYTD ReturnAUMInception
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
46
10.39%
6.52BDec 2007CZA vs FMDE
AMG Yacktman Focused FundLarge Cap Value Equities
25
30.77%
May 1997CZA vs YAFFX
Franklin Utilities FundUtilities Equities
14
5.84%
Sep 1948CZA vs FKUTX
First Trust Mid Cap US Equity Select ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
7
-1.53%
16.27MJun 2017CZA vs RNMC
PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth FundMid Cap Growth Equities
83
25.05%
Nov 2004CZA vs POAGX
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETFLarge Cap Growth Equities
40
7.11%
132.28BMay 2000CZA vs IWF
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
18
1.21%
1.55BApr 2017CZA vs FLQM
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index FundLarge Cap Growth Equities
32
8.60%
CZA vs FSPGX
AT&T Inc.
17
-3.08%
CZA vs T
Vanguard S&P 500 ETFS&P 500
70
10.91%
1.60TSep 2010CZA vs VOO
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
57
12.50%
114.46MOct 2018CZA vs LSAF
Fidelity Mid Cap Index FundMid Cap Blend Equities
43
12.78%
Sep 2011CZA vs FSMDX
iShares Micro-Cap ETFSmall Cap Blend Equities
71
18.97%
1.44BAug 2005CZA vs IWC
iShares MSCI Peru ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
71
16.05%
531.07MJun 2009CZA vs EPU
First Trust Dividend Strength ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
45
6.54%
32.61MDec 2006CZA vs FTDS
Permanent Portfolio Permanent PortfolioDiversified Portfolio
46
7.27%
Nov 1982CZA vs PRPFX
First Eagle Global Fund Class AGlobal Equities
60
8.55%
Jan 1979CZA vs SGENX
VanEck Agribusiness ETFLarge Cap Blend Equities
27
10.10%
940.38MAug 2007CZA vs MOO
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETFMid Cap Blend Equities, ESG
64
15.77%
18.10MFeb 2021CZA vs LOPP

Compare CZA with Any Fund or Stock

Compare CZA with any ETF, mutual fund, or stock using PortfoliosLab's comparison tool.


 

Diversifiers

Pair CZA with funds that move differently

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF alternatives help with substitution. Diversifiers are the next step when you want funds with lower historical correlation to CZA.

Explore CZA Diversifiers