PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the Mid Cap Blend Equities category. Below you'll find alternative ETFs from the same category, ranked by key criteria, plus funds that investors commonly compare with CZA. Use the tables to find lower-cost options, better risk-adjusted returns, or a closer substitute for your current allocation.

Cheapest Alternatives to CZA

CZA charges 0.69% annually. There are 66 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with lower expense ratios, going as low as 0.03%.


Best Risk-Adjusted Alternatives to CZA

CZA has a PortfoliosLab risk / return rank of 39. There are 54 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with higher risk-adjusted ranks, going as high as 94.


Top Performing CZA Alternatives (YTD)

CZA is at 9.13% YTD. There are 58 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with higher YTD returns, going as high as 45.22%.


Lowest Volatility Alternatives to CZA

CZA has 12.78% 1-year volatility. There are 14 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with lower 1-year volatility, going as low as 8.84%.


Lowest Drawdown Alternatives to CZA

CZA has a 1-year max drawdown of -9.21%. There are 41 ETFs in the Mid Cap Blend Equities category with shallower 1-year drawdowns, going as shallow as -6.00%.


Other ETFs from Invesco

The 10 most viewed Invesco ETFs shown here include QQQ, SPMO, QQQM and span 12 categories. AUM among these funds goes as high as $493B.


Often Compared With CZA

Investors most often compare CZA with IJH, FMDE, YAFFX. These 19 comparison targets span 10 categories, based on PortfoliosLab usage data.


SymbolNameCategoryRisk / Return RankYTD ReturnAUMInception
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
55
15.34%
124.01BMay 2000CZA vs IJH
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
46
10.87%
6.97BDec 2007CZA vs FMDE
AMG Yacktman Focused FundLarge Cap Value Equities
12
19.89%
May 1997CZA vs YAFFX
Franklin Utilities FundUtilities Equities
23
8.61%
Sep 1948CZA vs FKUTX
PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth FundMid Cap Growth Equities
79
23.71%
Nov 2004CZA vs POAGX
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETFLarge Cap Growth Equities
27
1.31%
127.91BMay 2000CZA vs IWF
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
21
2.94%
1.52BApr 2017CZA vs FLQM
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index FundLarge Cap Growth Equities
16
1.51%
CZA vs FSPGX
AT&T Inc.
11
-7.94%
CZA vs T
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
63
14.16%
117.99MOct 2018CZA vs LSAF
Vanguard S&P 500 ETFS&P 500
60
8.08%
1.70TSep 2010CZA vs VOO
Fidelity Mid Cap Index FundMid Cap Blend Equities
40
12.73%
Sep 2011CZA vs FSMDX
iShares Micro-Cap ETFSmall Cap Blend Equities
76
22.37%
1.46BAug 2005CZA vs IWC
iShares MSCI Peru ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
77
16.52%
548.10MJun 2009CZA vs EPU
Tema American Reshoring ETFMid Cap Blend Equities302.20MMay 2023CZA vs RSHO
Permanent Portfolio Class IDiversified Portfolio
26
1.99%
Dec 1982CZA vs PRPFX
First Trust Dividend Strength ETFMid Cap Blend Equities
53
7.85%
38.61MDec 2006CZA vs FTDS
VanEck Agribusiness ETFLarge Cap Blend Equities
17
6.00%
898.62MAug 2007CZA vs MOO
First Eagle Global Fund Class AGlobal Equities
37
3.79%
Jan 1979CZA vs SGENX

Compare CZA with Any Fund or Stock

Compare CZA with any ETF, mutual fund, or stock using PortfoliosLab's comparison tool.


 

Diversifiers

Pair CZA with funds that move differently

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF alternatives help with substitution. Diversifiers are the next step when you want funds with lower historical correlation to CZA.

Explore CZA Diversifiers