PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CZA vs. FMDE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CZA vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.06%
36.12%
CZA
FMDE

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZA achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly lower than FMDE's 24.98% return.


CZA

YTD

16.70%

1M

-0.83%

6M

8.94%

1Y

27.43%

5Y (annualized)

9.04%

10Y (annualized)

9.65%

FMDE

YTD

24.98%

1M

2.82%

6M

12.78%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


CZAFMDE
Daily Std Dev12.09%13.29%
Max Drawdown-53.20%-6.79%
Current Drawdown-2.68%-2.59%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CZA vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio.


CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Expense ratio chart for CZA: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for FMDE: current value at 0.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.23%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between CZA and FMDE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CZA vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CZA, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for CZA, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.20
The chart of Omega ratio for CZA, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for CZA, currently valued at 3.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.15
The chart of Martin ratio for CZA, currently valued at 12.31, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.31
CZA
FMDE

Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

CZA vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison

CZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than FMDE's 0.87% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
1.17%1.36%1.71%0.89%1.42%1.40%1.26%1.10%1.87%1.37%0.74%1.01%
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CZA vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZA drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -6.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZA and FMDE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.68%
-2.59%
CZA
FMDE

Volatility

CZA vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.12%
4.32%
CZA
FMDE