CZA vs. FLQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM).
CZA and FLQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CZA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. FLQM is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2017. Both CZA and FLQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CZA or FLQM.
Performance
CZA vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZA achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly lower than FLQM's 18.25% return.
CZA
16.70%
-0.83%
8.94%
27.43%
9.04%
9.65%
FLQM
18.25%
0.05%
8.40%
30.21%
13.05%
N/A
Key characteristics
| CZA | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.29 | 2.33 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.20 | 3.33 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.15 | 4.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.31 | 11.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.25% | 2.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.09% | 12.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.20% | -37.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.68% | -2.66% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CZA vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CZA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CZA and FLQM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CZA vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CZA vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison
CZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than FLQM's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZA Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.89% | 1.42% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.10% | 1.87% | 1.37% | 0.74% | 1.01% |
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.33% | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.36% | 1.45% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CZA vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZA drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, which is greater than FLQM's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZA and FLQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CZA vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.