PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZA vs. OPTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CZA vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CZA vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
0.64%8.31%7.90%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
1.93%22.83%16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZA achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 1.93% return.


CZA

1D
0.28%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
0.64%
6M
2.83%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
10.07%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
10.14%

OPTZ

1D
1.51%
1M
-5.68%
YTD
1.93%
6M
4.54%
1Y
36.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CZA vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CZA vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZA
CZA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

OPTZ
OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZA vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CZAOPTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

1.57

-1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.75

2.29

-1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

2.56

-1.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.81

11.83

-9.02

CZA vs. OPTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZA Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the OPTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZA and OPTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CZAOPTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.57

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.06

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between CZA and OPTZ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CZA vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison

CZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than OPTZ's 0.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
1.55%1.56%1.27%1.36%1.71%0.89%1.42%1.40%1.27%1.10%1.87%1.37%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.57%0.58%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CZA vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZA drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, which is greater than OPTZ's maximum drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZA and OPTZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CZAOPTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.20%

-25.75%

-27.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-14.58%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.77%

-5.68%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.93%

-3.61%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.15%

+0.04%

Volatility

CZA vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) is 5.17%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that CZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CZAOPTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

7.54%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

13.01%

-3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

23.40%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

20.61%

-4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

20.61%

-1.35%