CZA vs. FKUTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX).
CZA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. FKUTX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 29, 1948.
Performance
CZA vs. FKUTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CZA vs. FKUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZA Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | 0.36% | 8.31% | 12.14% | 7.00% | -5.91% | 27.42% | 0.35% | 32.27% | -8.89% | 21.90% |
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund | 9.83% | 14.59% | 27.18% | -4.91% | 1.67% | 18.00% | -1.87% | 27.28% | 2.54% | 9.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZA achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than FKUTX's 9.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CZA having a 10.03% annualized return and FKUTX not far ahead at 10.13%.
CZA
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
FKUTX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CZA vs. FKUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CZA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FKUTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CZA vs. FKUTX — Risk / Return Rank
CZA
FKUTX
CZA vs. FKUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CZA | FKUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 1.43 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.91 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 2.74 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 7.58 | -4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CZA | FKUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.43 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.72 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.61 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between CZA and FKUTX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CZA vs. FKUTX - Dividend Comparison
CZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than FKUTX's 7.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZA Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | 1.55% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.89% | 1.42% | 1.40% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.87% | 1.37% |
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund | 7.50% | 7.70% | 8.66% | 6.47% | 3.73% | 4.96% | 9.88% | 4.29% | 5.83% | 3.55% | 2.76% | 6.14% |
Drawdowns
CZA vs. FKUTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZA drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, which is greater than FKUTX's maximum drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZA and FKUTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CZA | FKUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -43.59% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -8.19% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.92% | -22.53% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.18% | -36.56% | -9.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -2.74% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -7.01% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.96% | +0.21% |
Volatility
CZA vs. FKUTX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) have volatilities of 5.16% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CZA | FKUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 5.17% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 9.80% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 15.06% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 16.77% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 18.78% | +0.48% |