ZYME vs. HCC
ZYME (Zymeworks Inc.) and HCC (Warrior Met Coal, Inc.) are both stocks. ZYME operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while HCC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, ZYME returned -7.73%/yr vs 37.06%/yr for HCC. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ZYME vs. HCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZYME achieves a -17.17% return, which is significantly lower than HCC's -8.53% return.
ZYME
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -17.10%
- 6M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- 73.51%
- 3Y*
- 43.44%
- 5Y*
- -7.73%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.31%
HCC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- -8.53%
- 1Y
- 56.99%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- 37.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.09M | $52.88M | $70.17M | |
ZYME Zymeworks Inc. | $8.35M | $10.95M | $15.36M |
ZYME vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZYME Zymeworks Inc. | -17.17% | 79.85% | 40.90% | 32.19% | -52.04% | -65.32% | 3.96% | 209.67% | 93.33% | -43.75% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | -8.53% | 63.49% | -9.79% | 81.59% | 41.03% | 21.82% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 23.20% | 125.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZYME and HCC is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
ZYME:
$1.60B
HCC:
$4.25B
ZYME:
-$587.50
HCC:
$2.61
ZYME:
20.82
HCC:
2.89
ZYME:
0.01
HCC:
1.93
ZYME:
$78.86M
HCC:
$1.47B
ZYME:
$77.16M
HCC:
$887.07M
ZYME:
-$47.18B
HCC:
$296.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZYME vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank
ZYME
HCC
ZYME vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZYME | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 1.94 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 4.30 | +2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZYME vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZYME drawdown since its inception was -91.81%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZYME and HCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZYME | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.81% | -64.81% | -27.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.63% | -29.51% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.75% | -45.53% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.12% | -45.53% | -41.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.61% | -27.00% | -34.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.60% | -18.20% | -34.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.91% | 13.28% | -2.37% |
Volatility
ZYME vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison
Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) at 9.08%. This indicates that ZYME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZYME | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.02% | 9.08% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.82% | 36.13% | -6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.18% | 53.16% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 49.24% | +12.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.28% | 52.33% | +8.95% |
Dividends
ZYME vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison
ZYME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 0.40% | 0.36% | 1.51% | 1.90% | 4.45% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 21.85% | 27.91% | 45.17% |
ZYME Zymeworks Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZYME vs. HCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zymeworks Inc. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ZYME and HCC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZYME has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to HCC (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZYME dropped -91.81% vs HCC's -64.81%.
ZYME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZYME and HCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer