PortfoliosLab logo
HCC vs. AMR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HCC and AMR is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HCC vs. AMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HCC:

-0.48

AMR:

-1.10

Sortino Ratio

HCC:

-0.43

AMR:

-1.83

Omega Ratio

HCC:

0.95

AMR:

0.79

Calmar Ratio

HCC:

-0.50

AMR:

-0.75

Martin Ratio

HCC:

-0.94

AMR:

-1.41

Ulcer Index

HCC:

23.98%

AMR:

39.95%

Daily Std Dev

HCC:

48.37%

AMR:

51.84%

Max Drawdown

HCC:

-64.81%

AMR:

-97.35%

Current Drawdown

HCC:

-34.75%

AMR:

-71.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HCC:

$2.46B

AMR:

$1.64B

EPS

HCC:

$2.00

AMR:

$2.04

PE Ratio

HCC:

23.44

AMR:

61.48

PS Ratio

HCC:

1.94

AMR:

0.62

PB Ratio

HCC:

1.23

AMR:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

HCC:

$1.32B

AMR:

$2.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HCC:

$442.62M

AMR:

$140.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

HCC:

$219.44M

AMR:

$204.62M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCC achieves a -10.04% return, which is significantly higher than AMR's -37.33% return.


HCC

YTD

-10.04%

1M

-1.29%

6M

-25.57%

1Y

-24.35%

5Y*

31.46%

10Y*

N/A

AMR

YTD

-37.33%

1M

0.96%

6M

-46.67%

1Y

-56.23%

5Y*

112.98%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCC vs. AMR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCC is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCC is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCC is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCC is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCC is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCC is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMR is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMR is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMR is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMR is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMR is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMR is 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCC vs. AMR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is higher than the AMR Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCC and AMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HCC vs. AMR - Dividend Comparison

HCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
0.66%1.51%1.90%4.45%0.78%0.94%21.84%27.91%45.17%
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.57%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.15%

Drawdowns

HCC vs. AMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCC drawdown since its inception was -64.81%, smaller than the maximum AMR drawdown of -97.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCC and AMR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HCC vs. AMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) is 12.48%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that HCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HCC vs. AMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Warrior Met Coal, Inc. and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
299.94M
531.96M
(HCC) Total Revenue
(AMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HCC vs. AMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Warrior Met Coal, Inc. and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
97.4%
-3.4%
(HCC) Gross Margin
(AMR) Gross Margin
HCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 292.07M and revenue of 299.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.4%.

AMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of -17.89M and revenue of 531.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -3.4%.

HCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.38M and revenue of 299.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.8%.

AMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -40.18M and revenue of 531.96M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.6%.

HCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of -8.17M and revenue of 299.94M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

AMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -33.95M and revenue of 531.96M, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.