PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCC vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HCC vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCC achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.64% return.


HCC

1D
-4.72%
1M
6.00%
YTD
2.92%
6M
3.79%
1Y
110.65%
3Y*
37.28%
5Y*
43.78%
10Y*

COST

1D
-1.46%
1M
-9.42%
YTD
10.64%
6M
11.51%
1Y
-2.40%
3Y*
23.66%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
21.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCC vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
2.92%63.49%-9.79%81.59%41.03%21.82%2.30%1.98%23.20%131.47%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
10.64%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HCC and COST is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017

0.12

Fundamentals

EPS

HCC:

$2.61

COST:

$26.51

PE Ratio

HCC:

34.70

COST:

35.90

PEG Ratio

HCC:

0.81

COST:

2.81

PS Ratio

HCC:

3.25

COST:

1.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

HCC:

$1.47B

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HCC:

$887.07M

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

HCC:

$296.72M

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCC vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCC
HCC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCCCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.00

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

-0.12

+3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

-0.27

+9.76

HCC vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCC and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCC drawdown since its inception was -64.81%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCC and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCCCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.81%

-53.39%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-15.14%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.53%

-20.74%

-24.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.53%

-31.40%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.86%

-13.06%

-4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-13.36%

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.98%

6.81%

+3.17%

Volatility

HCC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a higher volatility of 24.34% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.60%. This indicates that HCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCCCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.34%

6.60%

+17.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.69%

14.49%

+22.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.43%

18.93%

+38.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.69%

22.74%

+26.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.52%

21.96%

+30.56%

Dividends

HCC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

HCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than COST's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.56%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
0.35%0.36%1.51%1.90%4.45%0.78%0.94%21.85%27.91%45.17%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HCC vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Warrior Met Coal, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
458.59M
70.53B
(HCC) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HCC vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Warrior Met Coal, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.2%
-25.1%
Portfolio components
HCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 450.26M and revenue of 458.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

HCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 79.37M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

HCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 72.34M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HCC and COST have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCC has higher volatility (24.34%) compared to COST (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCC dropped -64.81% vs COST's -53.39%.

HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCC and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer