PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZYME vs. UMBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZYME vs. UMBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZYME achieves a -7.52% return, which is significantly lower than UMBF's 10.25% return.


ZYME

1D
1.00%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-7.52%
6M
-7.13%
1Y
101.57%
3Y*
41.09%
5Y*
-5.15%
10Y*

UMBF

1D
-2.20%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.70%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
27.92%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZYME vs. UMBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZYME
Zymeworks Inc.
-7.52%79.85%40.90%32.19%-52.04%-65.32%3.96%209.67%93.33%-41.59%
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation
10.25%3.44%37.34%2.21%-19.97%56.04%2.64%14.71%-13.86%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ZYME and UMBF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.17

Fundamentals

EPS

ZYME:

-$583.41

UMBF:

$15.48

PS Ratio

ZYME:

23.41

UMBF:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZYME:

$78.86M

UMBF:

$4.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZYME:

$77.16M

UMBF:

$1.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZYME:

-$47.18B

UMBF:

$937.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZYME vs. UMBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZYME
ZYME Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ZYME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZYME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZYME Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ZYME Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZYME Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBF
UMBF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UMBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBF Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZYME vs. UMBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZYMEUMBFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

0.89

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

1.34

+1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.04

1.29

+3.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.18

2.96

+8.22

ZYME vs. UMBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZYME Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the UMBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZYME and UMBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZYMEUMBFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

0.89

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.22

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.26

-0.14

Drawdowns

ZYME vs. UMBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZYME drawdown since its inception was -91.81%, which is greater than UMBF's maximum drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZYME and UMBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZYMEUMBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.81%

-52.70%

-39.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.28%

-18.57%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.75%

-31.80%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.84%

-50.25%

-37.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.14%

-5.98%

-51.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.42%

-17.77%

-34.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.12%

8.06%

+1.06%

Volatility

ZYME vs. UMBF - Volatility Comparison

Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) has a higher volatility of 14.12% compared to UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) at 7.76%. This indicates that ZYME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZYMEUMBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.12%

7.76%

+6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.53%

18.68%

+10.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.11%

27.03%

+26.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.94%

33.31%

+28.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.56%

33.52%

+28.04%

Dividends

ZYME vs. UMBF - Dividend Comparison

ZYME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation
1.31%1.42%1.39%1.83%1.78%1.30%1.81%1.76%1.92%1.45%1.28%2.04%
ZYME
Zymeworks Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZYME vs. UMBF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zymeworks Inc. and UMB Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B202220232024202520260
867.07M
(ZYME) Total Revenue
(UMBF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ZYME and UMBF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZYME has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to UMBF (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZYME dropped -91.81% vs UMBF's -52.70%.

ZYME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZYME and UMBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer