HCC vs. EBF
HCC (Warrior Met Coal, Inc.) and EBF (Ennis, Inc.) are both stocks. HCC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials), while EBF operates in Business Equipment & Supplies (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, HCC returned 38.12%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for EBF. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HCC vs. EBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCC achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than EBF's 20.14% return.
HCC
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- 6M
- -17.26%
- YTD
- -9.00%
- 1Y
- 51.83%
- 3Y*
- 26.62%
- 5Y*
- 38.12%
- 10Y*
- —
EBF
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 15.78%
- YTD
- 20.14%
- 1Y
- 20.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
HCC vs. EBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | -9.00% | 63.49% | -9.79% | 81.59% | 41.03% | 21.82% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 23.20% | 131.47% |
EBF Ennis, Inc. | 20.14% | -9.96% | 12.59% | 3.64% | 19.38% | 14.78% | -13.46% | 17.54% | -2.77% | 35.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCC and EBF is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017 | 0.26 |
The correlation between HCC and EBF shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HCC:
$4.23B
EBF:
$527.47M
HCC:
$2.61
EBF:
$1.65
HCC:
30.69
EBF:
12.60
HCC:
0.72
EBF:
0.90
HCC:
2.87
EBF:
1.37
HCC:
1.92
EBF:
1.71
HCC:
$1.47B
EBF:
$393.82M
HCC:
$887.07M
EBF:
$121.26M
HCC:
$296.72M
EBF:
$71.61M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCC vs. EBF — Risk / Return Rank
HCC
EBF
HCC vs. EBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCC | EBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.67 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 3.82 | +1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCC vs. EBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCC drawdown since its inception was -64.81%, smaller than the maximum EBF drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCC and EBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCC | EBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.81% | -73.10% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.51% | -11.14% | -18.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.53% | -22.80% | -22.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -22.80% | -22.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.38% | -4.57% | -22.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.14% | -20.54% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 4.89% | +6.75% |
Volatility
HCC vs. EBF - Volatility Comparison
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to Ennis, Inc. (EBF) at 7.92%. This indicates that HCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCC | EBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | 7.92% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.58% | 17.35% | +20.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.30% | 22.42% | +32.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.42% | 21.51% | +27.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.45% | 26.07% | +26.38% |
Dividends
HCC vs. EBF - Dividend Comparison
HCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than EBF's 6.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBF Ennis, Inc. | 4.80% | 5.55% | 16.60% | 4.56% | 4.51% | 4.86% | 5.04% | 4.16% | 4.94% | 3.61% | 11.67% | 3.64% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 0.40% | 0.36% | 1.51% | 1.90% | 4.45% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 21.85% | 27.91% | 45.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HCC vs. EBF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Warrior Met Coal, Inc. and Ennis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HCC vs. EBF - Profitability Comparison
HCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 450.26M and revenue of 458.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
EBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.08M and revenue of 98.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.
HCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 79.37M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
EBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.59M and revenue of 98.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.
HCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 72.34M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
EBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a net income of 9.88M and revenue of 98.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HCC and EBF have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCC has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to EBF (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCC dropped -64.81% vs EBF's -73.10%.
HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCC and EBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer