PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZS vs. MS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZS vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZS achieves a -42.42% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 21.88% return.


ZS

1D
2.70%
1M
-19.58%
YTD
-42.42%
6M
-45.18%
1Y
-57.11%
3Y*
-6.33%
5Y*
-9.02%
10Y*

MS

1D
0.65%
1M
11.18%
YTD
21.88%
6M
21.28%
1Y
69.28%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
27.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZS vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
-42.42%24.67%-18.57%98.00%-65.18%60.90%329.48%18.59%42.58%
MS
Morgan Stanley
21.88%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-29.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ZS and MS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2018

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZS:

$20.82B

MS:

$340.97B

EPS

ZS:

-$0.49

MS:

$11.41

PS Ratio

ZS:

6.48

MS:

2.84

PB Ratio

ZS:

8.80

MS:

3.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZS:

$3.17B

MS:

$120.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZS:

$2.43B

MS:

$69.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZS:

$69.08M

MS:

$27.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZS vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZS
ZS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZS vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.43

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

3.53

-4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.55

11.65

-13.20

ZS vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZS Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZS and MS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZS vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZS drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZS and MS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.41%

-88.12%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.89%

-18.83%

-46.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.89%

-29.24%

-35.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.41%

-32.38%

-44.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.88%

-1.94%

-62.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-33.69%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.90%

5.70%

+31.20%

Volatility

ZS vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a higher volatility of 44.34% compared to Morgan Stanley (MS) at 8.62%. This indicates that ZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.34%

8.62%

+35.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.43%

21.46%

+35.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.73%

25.81%

+32.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.07%

28.75%

+27.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.78%

31.51%

+27.27%

Dividends

ZS vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

ZS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.87%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZS vs. MS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zscaler, Inc. and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
850.48M
33.15B
(ZS) Total Revenue
(MS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZS vs. MS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zscaler, Inc. and Morgan Stanley over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
77.4%
61.8%
Portfolio components
ZS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.82M and revenue of 850.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

MS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

ZS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

MS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

ZS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -13.88M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.

MS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZS and MS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZS has higher volatility (44.34%) compared to MS (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZS dropped -76.41% vs MS's -88.12%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZS and MS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer