PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MS vs. SCHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MS vs. SCHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 20.48% return, which is significantly higher than SCHW's 6.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed SCHW with an annualized return of 25.84%, while SCHW has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.


MS

1D
0.72%
1M
-1.10%
6M
16.37%
YTD
20.48%
1Y
54.71%
3Y*
36.38%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*
25.84%
ALL TIME*
13.01%

SCHW

1D
0.87%
1M
8.49%
6M
1.98%
YTD
6.07%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
15.65%
ALL TIME*
19.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.18B$1.27B$1.26B
$904.80M$877.50M$995.78M

MS vs. SCHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MS
Morgan Stanley
20.48%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
6.07%36.65%9.17%-15.97%0.11%60.23%13.57%16.38%-18.43%31.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MS and SCHW is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 1993

0.59

The correlation between MS and SCHW shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MS:

$332.03B

SCHW:

$183.03B

EPS

MS:

$11.41

SCHW:

$5.70

PE Ratio

MS:

18.43

SCHW:

18.46

PEG Ratio

MS:

1.73

SCHW:

1.05

PS Ratio

MS:

2.79

SCHW:

9.00

PB Ratio

MS:

3.21

SCHW:

59.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

MS:

$120.22B

SCHW:

$20.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MS:

$69.72B

SCHW:

$14.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

MS:

$27.21B

SCHW:

$11.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MS vs. SCHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHW
SCHW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SCHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHW Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MS vs. SCHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSSCHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

0.46

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

1.00

+7.59

MS vs. SCHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MS Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the SCHW Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MS and SCHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MS vs. SCHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHW drawdown of -86.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and SCHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSSCHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-86.79%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.83%

-19.83%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-24.94%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.38%

-49.70%

+17.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-51.08%

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-1.15%

-6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-35.43%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

9.08%

-3.12%

Volatility

MS vs. SCHW - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) at 6.44%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSSCHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.15%

6.44%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.56%

20.80%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.83%

25.34%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.82%

32.11%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.37%

33.11%

-1.74%

Dividends

MS vs. SCHW - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than SCHW's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.97%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
1.12%1.08%1.35%1.45%1.01%0.86%1.36%1.43%1.11%0.62%0.68%0.73%

Financials

MS vs. SCHW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and The Charles Schwab Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MS and SCHW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to SCHW (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs SCHW's -86.79%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MS and SCHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer