PortfoliosLab logo
MS vs. PNC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MS and PNC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MS vs. PNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MS:

0.99

PNC:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

MS:

1.63

PNC:

0.97

Omega Ratio

MS:

1.24

PNC:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

MS:

1.27

PNC:

0.52

Martin Ratio

MS:

4.00

PNC:

1.41

Ulcer Index

MS:

9.26%

PNC:

10.96%

Daily Std Dev

MS:

34.12%

PNC:

27.38%

Max Drawdown

MS:

-88.12%

PNC:

-76.65%

Current Drawdown

MS:

-9.21%

PNC:

-17.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MS:

$203.84B

PNC:

$69.22B

EPS

MS:

$8.53

PNC:

$14.15

PE Ratio

MS:

14.90

PNC:

12.37

PEG Ratio

MS:

143.18

PNC:

1.72

PS Ratio

MS:

3.19

PNC:

3.30

PB Ratio

MS:

2.01

PNC:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

MS:

$73.37B

PNC:

$20.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MS:

$28.72B

PNC:

$20.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

MS:

$10.46B

PNC:

$75.65B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than PNC's -7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed PNC with an annualized return of 16.12%, while PNC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.


MS

YTD

2.55%

1M

18.46%

6M

-3.44%

1Y

33.41%

5Y*

32.33%

10Y*

16.12%

PNC

YTD

-7.56%

1M

16.34%

6M

-14.99%

1Y

15.18%

5Y*

16.89%

10Y*

9.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MS vs. PNC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MS is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MS is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MS is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PNC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PNC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PNC is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PNC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PNC is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PNC is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PNC is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MS vs. PNC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MS Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the PNC Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MS and PNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MS vs. PNC - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than PNC's 3.66% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.91%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%
PNC
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
3.66%3.27%3.94%3.64%2.39%3.09%2.63%2.91%1.80%1.81%2.11%2.06%

Drawdowns

MS vs. PNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than PNC's maximum drawdown of -76.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and PNC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MS vs. PNC - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) at 7.35%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MS vs. PNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20212022202320242025
29.13B
5.23B
(MS) Total Revenue
(PNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items