MS vs. PNC
MS (Morgan Stanley) and PNC (The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — MS in Capital Markets, PNC in Banks - Regional. Over the past 10 years, MS returned 27.59%/yr vs 14.36%/yr for PNC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MS vs. PNC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 27.08% return, which is significantly higher than PNC's 12.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed PNC with an annualized return of 27.59%, while PNC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.36% annualized return.
MS
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 12.84%
- YTD
- 27.08%
- 6M
- 27.48%
- 1Y
- 72.47%
- 3Y*
- 40.74%
- 5Y*
- 25.54%
- 10Y*
- 27.59%
PNC
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 36.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.36%
MS vs. PNC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 27.08% | 45.16% | 39.73% | 13.93% | -10.34% | 46.65% | 38.09% | 32.67% | -22.76% | 26.61% |
PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 12.88% | 12.24% | 29.39% | 2.71% | -18.59% | 38.18% | -2.78% | 40.91% | -16.98% | 25.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between MS and PNC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 1993 | 0.59 |
The correlation between MS and PNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MS:
$355.51B
PNC:
$95.40B
MS:
$11.41
PNC:
$18.09
MS:
19.55
PNC:
12.83
MS:
1.84
PNC:
1.73
MS:
2.96
PNC:
2.89
MS:
3.40
PNC:
1.50
MS:
$120.22B
PNC:
$32.06B
MS:
$69.72B
PNC:
$23.04B
MS:
$27.21B
PNC:
$8.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MS vs. PNC — Risk / Return Rank
MS
PNC
MS vs. PNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MS | PNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.30 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 2.15 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.76 | 4.88 | +7.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MS vs. PNC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than PNC's maximum drawdown of -76.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and PNC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MS | PNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.12% | -76.65% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.83% | -17.21% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.24% | -29.77% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.38% | -47.98% | +15.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -49.58% | -1.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -3.57% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -15.67% | -18.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 7.57% | -1.87% |
Volatility
MS vs. PNC - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) at 7.25%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MS | PNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 7.25% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.58% | 16.58% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.85% | 21.76% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.67% | 27.11% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.51% | 29.72% | +1.79% |
Dividends
MS vs. PNC - Dividend Comparison
MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than PNC's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS Morgan Stanley | 1.79% | 2.17% | 2.82% | 3.49% | 3.47% | 2.14% | 2.04% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.73% |
PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 2.93% | 3.16% | 3.27% | 3.94% | 3.64% | 2.39% | 3.09% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 2.11% |
Financials
MS vs. PNC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MS vs. PNC - Profitability Comparison
MS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.
PNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.96B and revenue of 6.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.6%.
MS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
PNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.19B and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.5%.
MS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
PNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.77B and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in a net margin of 28.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MS and PNC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MS has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to PNC (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs PNC's -76.65%.
MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MS and PNC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer