PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MS vs. BLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MS vs. BLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 27.08% return, which is significantly higher than BLK's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed BLK with an annualized return of 27.59%, while BLK has yielded a comparatively lower 14.46% annualized return.


MS

1D
-0.80%
1M
12.84%
YTD
27.08%
6M
27.48%
1Y
72.47%
3Y*
40.74%
5Y*
25.54%
10Y*
27.59%

BLK

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
0.16%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MS vs. BLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MS
Morgan Stanley
27.08%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
-0.79%6.55%29.29%17.86%-20.40%29.39%47.21%31.87%-21.59%38.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MS and BLK is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1999

0.54

The correlation between MS and BLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MS:

$355.51B

BLK:

$173.26B

EPS

MS:

$11.41

BLK:

$38.89

PE Ratio

MS:

19.55

BLK:

27.00

PS Ratio

MS:

2.96

BLK:

6.57

PB Ratio

MS:

3.40

BLK:

3.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

MS:

$120.22B

BLK:

$25.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MS:

$69.72B

BLK:

$15.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

MS:

$27.21B

BLK:

$9.79B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MS vs. BLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BLK
BLK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLK Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MS vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSBLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.09

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

0.42

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

0.93

+11.83

MS vs. BLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MS Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the BLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MS and BLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MS vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than BLK's maximum drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and BLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSBLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-60.36%

-27.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.83%

-22.45%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-23.74%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.38%

-43.90%

+11.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-43.90%

-7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-11.27%

+10.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-11.93%

-21.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

10.15%

-4.45%

Volatility

MS vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) at 6.99%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSBLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

6.99%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.58%

20.50%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.85%

25.83%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.67%

26.74%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

27.75%

+3.76%

Dividends

MS vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than BLK's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
2.08%1.95%1.99%2.46%2.75%1.80%2.01%2.63%3.08%1.95%2.41%2.56%
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.79%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Financials

MS vs. BLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley and BlackRock, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
33.15B
6.77B
(MS) Total Revenue
(BLK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MS vs. BLK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Morgan Stanley and BlackRock, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
61.8%
81.4%
Portfolio components
MS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

BLK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.51B and revenue of 6.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

MS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

BLK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.

MS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

BLK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlackRock, Inc. reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.77B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MS and BLK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to BLK (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs BLK's -60.36%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MS and BLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer