ZS vs. LYFT
ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) and LYFT (Lyft, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ZS in Software - Infrastructure, LYFT in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, ZS returned -7.99%/yr vs -24.02%/yr for LYFT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZS vs. LYFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZS achieves a -42.54% return, which is significantly lower than LYFT's -27.62% return.
ZS
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -15.04%
- YTD
- -42.54%
- 6M
- -47.22%
- 1Y
- -57.35%
- 3Y*
- -5.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
LYFT
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- -27.62%
- 6M
- -37.66%
- 1Y
- -9.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- -24.02%
- 10Y*
- —
ZS vs. LYFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | -42.54% | 24.67% | -18.57% | 98.00% | -65.18% | 60.90% | 329.48% | -34.44% |
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | -27.62% | 50.16% | -13.94% | 36.03% | -74.21% | -13.03% | 14.20% | -45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZS and LYFT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019 | 0.32 |
The correlation between ZS and LYFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZS:
$20.78B
LYFT:
$5.64B
ZS:
-$0.49
LYFT:
$6.90
ZS:
6.47
LYFT:
0.89
ZS:
8.78
LYFT:
1.86
ZS:
$3.17B
LYFT:
$6.52B
ZS:
$2.43B
LYFT:
$2.82B
ZS:
$69.08M
LYFT:
$51.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZS vs. LYFT — Risk / Return Rank
ZS
LYFT
ZS vs. LYFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZS | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.01 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.20 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | -0.35 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZS | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | -0.19 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | -0.36 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | -0.31 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
ZS vs. LYFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZS drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, smaller than the maximum LYFT drawdown of -89.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZS and LYFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZS | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.41% | -89.79% | +13.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.89% | -48.51% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.89% | -55.23% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.41% | -87.28% | +10.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.95% | -82.09% | +17.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.63% | -64.72% | +32.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.05% | 27.84% | +8.21% |
Volatility
ZS vs. LYFT - Volatility Comparison
Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a higher volatility of 44.44% compared to Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) at 12.33%. This indicates that ZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZS | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.44% | 12.33% | +32.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.30% | 34.77% | +22.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.72% | 50.18% | +8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.10% | 67.45% | -11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.42% | 68.19% | -9.77% |
Dividends
ZS vs. LYFT - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZS nor LYFT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ZS vs. LYFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zscaler, Inc. and Lyft, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZS vs. LYFT - Profitability Comparison
ZS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.82M and revenue of 850.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.
LYFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
ZS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
LYFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
ZS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zscaler, Inc. reported a net income of -13.88M and revenue of 850.48M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.
LYFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZS and LYFT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZS has higher volatility (44.44%) compared to LYFT (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZS dropped -76.41% vs LYFT's -89.79%.
LYFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZS and LYFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer