LYFT vs. GRAB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB).

Performance

LYFT vs. GRAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LYFT vs. GRAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LYFT Lyft, Inc.	-31.39%	50.16%	-13.94%	36.03%	-74.21%	-13.03%	24.03%
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited	-26.45%	5.72%	40.06%	4.66%	-54.84%	-44.56%	8.16%

Fundamentals

EPS LYFT : $0.33 GRAB : $0.06
PE Ratio LYFT : 40.36 GRAB : 58.90
PS Ratio LYFT : 0.78 GRAB : 4.66
Total Revenue (TTM) LYFT : $4.72B GRAB : $3.37B
Gross Profit (TTM) LYFT : $2.00B GRAB : $1.46B
EBITDA (TTM) LYFT : $208.24M GRAB : $421.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -31.39% return, which is significantly lower than GRAB's -26.45% return.

LYFT

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -31.39%
• 6M: -39.09%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: -27.12%
• 10Y*: —

GRAB

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -12.20%
• YTD: -26.45%
• 6M: -37.80%
• 1Y: -19.34%
• 3Y*: 6.83%
• 5Y*: -21.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LYFT vs. GRAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYFT

LYFT Risk / Return Rank: 46
LYFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LYFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LYFT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LYFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LYFT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

GRAB

GRAB Risk / Return Rank: 23
GRAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
GRAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GRAB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GRAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GRAB Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYFT vs. GRAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYFT	GRAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	-0.43	+0.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	-0.36	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.96	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	-0.42	+0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.55	-0.96	+1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYFT vs. GRAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the GRAB Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYFT and GRAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYFT	GRAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	-0.43	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	-0.35	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-0.32	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between LYFT and GRAB is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LYFT vs. GRAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYFT nor GRAB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LYFT vs. GRAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -89.79%, roughly equal to the maximum GRAB drawdown of -86.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and GRAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYFT	GRAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.79%	-86.46%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.51%	-45.27%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.64%	-86.46%	-1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.02%	-78.49%	-4.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.26%	-66.97%	+2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.74%	19.84%	+1.90%

Volatility

LYFT vs. GRAB - Volatility Comparison

Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) at 10.25%. This indicates that LYFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYFT	GRAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.10%	10.25%	+2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.87%	27.40%	+10.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.47%	45.26%	+15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.72%	60.60%	+7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.80%	61.29%	+7.51%

Financials