PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYFT vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYFT vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -27.26% return, which is significantly lower than UBER's -12.26% return.


LYFT

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-27.26%
6M
-36.90%
1Y
-8.21%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
-24.49%
10Y*

UBER

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
-12.26%
6M
-20.94%
1Y
-13.13%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYFT vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
-27.26%50.16%-13.94%36.03%-74.21%-13.03%14.20%-15.80%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-12.26%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-28.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LYFT and UBER is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.66

The correlation between LYFT and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYFT:

$5.67B

UBER:

$148.50B

EPS

LYFT:

$6.90

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

LYFT:

2.04

UBER:

17.68

PEG Ratio

LYFT:

0.00

UBER:

0.11

PS Ratio

LYFT:

0.90

UBER:

2.81

PB Ratio

LYFT:

1.87

UBER:

6.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYFT:

$6.52B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYFT:

$2.82B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYFT:

$51.76M

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYFT vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYFT
LYFT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LYFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYFT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LYFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYFT vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYFTUBERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.17

-0.40

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.11

-0.39

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.96

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.43

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.30

-0.76

+0.46

LYFT vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYFT and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYFTUBERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

-0.40

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.17

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

0.16

-0.47

Drawdowns

LYFT vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -89.79%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYFTUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.79%

-68.05%

-21.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.51%

-30.89%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.23%

-30.89%

-24.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.28%

-60.45%

-26.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.00%

-28.38%

-53.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.69%

-25.67%

-39.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.44%

17.22%

+10.22%

Volatility

LYFT vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) have volatilities of 11.57% and 11.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYFTUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.57%

11.90%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.76%

24.22%

+10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.93%

32.60%

+17.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.45%

44.84%

+22.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.23%

50.70%

+17.53%

Dividends

LYFT vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYFT nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LYFT vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.65B
13.20B
(LYFT) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYFT vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lyft, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
47.6%
45.0%
Portfolio components
LYFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

LYFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

LYFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYFT and UBER have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBER has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to LYFT (11.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFT dropped -89.79% vs UBER's -68.05%.

LYFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYFT and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer