LYFT vs. MCK
LYFT (Lyft, Inc.) and MCK (McKesson Corporation) are both stocks. LYFT operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MCK operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, LYFT returned -24.97%/yr vs 32.53%/yr for MCK. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LYFT vs. MCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -29.53% return, which is significantly lower than MCK's -5.26% return.
LYFT
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- -29.53%
- 6M
- -40.57%
- 1Y
- -12.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- -24.97%
- 10Y*
- —
MCK
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- 9.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.44%
- 5Y*
- 32.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
LYFT vs. MCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | -29.53% | 50.16% | -13.94% | 36.03% | -74.21% | -13.03% | 14.20% | -45.05% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | -5.26% | 44.54% | 23.67% | 24.13% | 51.82% | 44.23% | 27.06% | 19.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYFT and MCK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019 | 0.05 |
The correlation between LYFT and MCK shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (3 years) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LYFT:
$5.49B
MCK:
$95.17B
LYFT:
$6.90
MCK:
$38.38
LYFT:
1.98
MCK:
20.21
LYFT:
0.00
MCK:
0.27
LYFT:
0.87
MCK:
0.24
LYFT:
1.82
MCK:
13.76
LYFT:
$6.52B
MCK:
$403.43B
LYFT:
$2.82B
MCK:
$14.55B
LYFT:
$51.76M
MCK:
$6.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYFT vs. MCK — Risk / Return Rank
LYFT
MCK
LYFT vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYFT | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.09 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.35 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 0.95 | -1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYFT | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 0.33 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 1.35 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.45 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
LYFT vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -89.79%, which is greater than MCK's maximum drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and MCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYFT | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.79% | -82.84% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.51% | -27.17% | -21.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.23% | -27.17% | -28.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.28% | -27.17% | -60.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.56% | -22.01% | -60.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.71% | -28.65% | -36.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.71% | 9.96% | +17.75% |
Volatility
LYFT vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 6.94%. This indicates that LYFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYFT | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 6.94% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.65% | 22.76% | +11.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.03% | 29.08% | +20.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.43% | 24.20% | +43.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.20% | 28.82% | +39.38% |
Dividends
LYFT vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison
LYFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 0.42% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.32% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.53% |
Financials
LYFT vs. MCK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYFT vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison
LYFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
MCK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 96.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.
LYFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
MCK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 2.09B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
LYFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
MCK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.68B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYFT and MCK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYFT has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to MCK (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFT dropped -89.79% vs MCK's -82.84%.
MCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYFT and MCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer