PortfoliosLab logo
LYFT vs. MCK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LYFT and MCK is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

LYFT vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-84.40%
521.71%
LYFT
MCK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LYFT:

-0.47

MCK:

1.15

Sortino Ratio

LYFT:

-0.39

MCK:

1.56

Omega Ratio

LYFT:

0.95

MCK:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

LYFT:

-0.31

MCK:

1.31

Martin Ratio

LYFT:

-1.01

MCK:

3.22

Ulcer Index

LYFT:

27.57%

MCK:

9.71%

Daily Std Dev

LYFT:

59.14%

MCK:

27.32%

Max Drawdown

LYFT:

-89.79%

MCK:

-82.83%

Current Drawdown

LYFT:

-84.40%

MCK:

-3.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYFT:

$5.10B

MCK:

$87.10B

EPS

LYFT:

$0.06

MCK:

$21.82

PE Ratio

LYFT:

203.50

MCK:

31.85

PEG Ratio

LYFT:

0.25

MCK:

1.20

PS Ratio

LYFT:

0.88

MCK:

0.25

PB Ratio

LYFT:

6.65

MCK:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYFT:

$4.51B

MCK:

$268.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYFT:

$2.03B

MCK:

$9.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYFT:

-$129.43M

MCK:

$3.54B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -5.35% return, which is significantly lower than MCK's 22.08% return.


LYFT

YTD

-5.35%

1M

0.58%

6M

-8.95%

1Y

-25.41%

5Y*

-18.73%

10Y*

N/A

MCK

YTD

22.08%

1M

4.41%

6M

37.28%

1Y

28.51%

5Y*

38.23%

10Y*

12.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LYFT vs. MCK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LYFT is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LYFT is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LYFT is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LYFT is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LYFT is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LYFT is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MCK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCK is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCK is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCK is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCK is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCK is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCK is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LYFT vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LYFT, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LYFT: -0.47
MCK: 1.15
The chart of Sortino ratio for LYFT, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LYFT: -0.39
MCK: 1.56
The chart of Omega ratio for LYFT, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LYFT: 0.95
MCK: 1.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for LYFT, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LYFT: -0.31
MCK: 1.31
The chart of Martin ratio for LYFT, currently valued at -1.01, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LYFT: -1.01
MCK: 3.22

The current LYFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYFT and MCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.47
1.15
LYFT
MCK

Dividends

LYFT vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

LYFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.40%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%0.46%

Drawdowns

LYFT vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -89.79%, which is greater than MCK's maximum drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and MCK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-84.40%
-3.06%
LYFT
MCK

Volatility

LYFT vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a higher volatility of 23.51% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 8.93%. This indicates that LYFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
23.51%
8.93%
LYFT
MCK

Financials

LYFT vs. MCK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items