PortfoliosLab logo
LYFT vs. MCK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LYFT and MCK is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LYFT vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LYFT:

0.01

MCK:

1.06

Sortino Ratio

LYFT:

0.46

MCK:

1.57

Omega Ratio

LYFT:

1.06

MCK:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

LYFT:

-0.02

MCK:

1.35

Martin Ratio

LYFT:

-0.07

MCK:

3.32

Ulcer Index

LYFT:

26.77%

MCK:

9.73%

Daily Std Dev

LYFT:

65.06%

MCK:

27.86%

Max Drawdown

LYFT:

-89.79%

MCK:

-82.83%

Current Drawdown

LYFT:

-78.59%

MCK:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYFT:

$7.05B

MCK:

$90.52B

EPS

LYFT:

$0.15

MCK:

$25.71

PE Ratio

LYFT:

111.80

MCK:

28.17

PEG Ratio

LYFT:

0.49

MCK:

1.15

PS Ratio

LYFT:

1.18

MCK:

0.25

PB Ratio

LYFT:

8.41

MCK:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYFT:

$5.96B

MCK:

$359.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYFT:

$2.62B

MCK:

$13.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYFT:

-$158.28M

MCK:

$5.13B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a 29.92% return, which is significantly higher than MCK's 27.60% return.


LYFT

YTD

29.92%

1M

50.18%

6M

-3.12%

1Y

0.84%

3Y*

-4.21%

5Y*

-11.47%

10Y*

N/A

MCK

YTD

27.60%

1M

4.21%

6M

18.26%

1Y

29.27%

3Y*

31.73%

5Y*

38.72%

10Y*

12.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lyft, Inc.

McKesson Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LYFT vs. MCK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LYFT is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LYFT is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LYFT is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LYFT is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LYFT is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LYFT is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MCK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCK is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCK is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCK is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCK is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCK is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCK is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LYFT vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LYFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYFT and MCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LYFT vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

LYFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.38%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%0.46%

Drawdowns

LYFT vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -89.79%, which is greater than MCK's maximum drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and MCK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LYFT vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a higher volatility of 26.51% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 7.60%. This indicates that LYFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LYFT vs. MCK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20212022202320242025
1.45B
90.82B
(LYFT) Total Revenue
(MCK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYFT vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lyft, Inc. and McKesson Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
40.5%
4.0%
(LYFT) Gross Margin
(MCK) Gross Margin
LYFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 587.30M and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

MCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.64B and revenue of 90.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.0%.

LYFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -28.85M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.0%.

MCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 90.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

LYFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 2.57M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.

MCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 90.82B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.