ZIM vs. VGSH
ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) is a stock, while VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Over the past 5 years, ZIM returned 20.68%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for VGSH. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ZIM vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than VGSH's 0.48% return.
ZIM
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 19.30%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 43.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.68%
- 10Y*
- —
VGSH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
ZIM vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 19.30% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 0.48% | 5.07% | 4.00% | 4.31% | -3.86% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIM and VGSH is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIM vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank
ZIM
VGSH
ZIM vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIM | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.57 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 3.90 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 15.52 | -11.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIM | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.68 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.93 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.01 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
ZIM vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and VGSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIM | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -5.70% | -78.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.66% | -0.88% | -29.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.12% | -0.97% | -56.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -5.66% | -79.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -0.29% | -13.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.05% | -0.60% | -39.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.65% | 0.22% | +12.43% |
Volatility
ZIM vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 14.70% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.35%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIM | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | 0.35% | +14.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.41% | 0.88% | +36.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.01% | 1.29% | +51.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.89% | 1.97% | +63.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.72% | 1.57% | +66.15% |
Dividends
ZIM vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison
ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than VGSH's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 4.00% | 4.18% | 3.31% | 1.15% | 0.66% | 1.74% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.69% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 5.10% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIM and VGSH have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to VGSH (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIM dropped -84.68% vs VGSH's -5.70%.
VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIM and VGSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer