PortfoliosLab logo
IEP vs. UAN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IEP and UAN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IEP vs. UAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) and CVR Partners, LP (UAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IEP:

-0.77

UAN:

0.33

Sortino Ratio

IEP:

-0.97

UAN:

0.87

Omega Ratio

IEP:

0.87

UAN:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

IEP:

-0.45

UAN:

0.34

Martin Ratio

IEP:

-1.18

UAN:

1.09

Ulcer Index

IEP:

29.89%

UAN:

12.52%

Daily Std Dev

IEP:

45.08%

UAN:

29.47%

Max Drawdown

IEP:

-84.21%

UAN:

-96.77%

Current Drawdown

IEP:

-72.20%

UAN:

-19.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IEP:

$5.23B

UAN:

$853.28M

EPS

IEP:

-$1.64

UAN:

$7.13

PEG Ratio

IEP:

0.00

UAN:

-1.30

PS Ratio

IEP:

0.55

UAN:

1.58

PB Ratio

IEP:

2.95

UAN:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

IEP:

$9.54B

UAN:

$540.53M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IEP:

$676.00M

UAN:

$133.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

IEP:

-$187.00M

UAN:

$132.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEP achieves a 17.40% return, which is significantly higher than UAN's 12.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IEP has underperformed UAN with an annualized return of -8.41%, while UAN has yielded a comparatively higher 3.35% annualized return.


IEP

YTD

17.40%

1M

15.26%

6M

-15.58%

1Y

-34.52%

5Y*

-14.93%

10Y*

-8.41%

UAN

YTD

12.48%

1M

14.11%

6M

18.14%

1Y

9.74%

5Y*

78.26%

10Y*

3.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IEP vs. UAN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IEP is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IEP is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IEP is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IEP is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IEP is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IEP is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

UAN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UAN is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UAN is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UAN is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UAN is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UAN is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UAN is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IEP vs. UAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) and CVR Partners, LP (UAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IEP Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the UAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEP and UAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

IEP vs. UAN - Dividend Comparison

IEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.02%, more than UAN's 8.74% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
31.02%40.37%34.90%15.79%16.13%15.79%13.01%12.26%11.32%10.01%9.79%6.49%
UAN
CVR Partners, LP
8.74%8.81%40.64%19.21%5.62%0.00%12.90%0.00%0.61%11.81%15.61%14.48%

Drawdowns

IEP vs. UAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEP drawdown since its inception was -84.21%, smaller than the maximum UAN drawdown of -96.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEP and UAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IEP vs. UAN - Volatility Comparison

Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to CVR Partners, LP (UAN) at 4.58%. This indicates that IEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

IEP vs. UAN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Icahn Enterprises L.P. and CVR Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.17B
142.87M
(IEP) Total Revenue
(UAN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IEP vs. UAN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Icahn Enterprises L.P. and CVR Partners, LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
7.1%
29.7%
(IEP) Gross Margin
(UAN) Gross Margin
IEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a gross profit of 154.00M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.

UAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CVR Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 42.44M and revenue of 142.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

IEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported an operating income of -198.00M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.1%.

UAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CVR Partners, LP reported an operating income of 34.59M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.

IEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a net income of -422.00M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of -19.5%.

UAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CVR Partners, LP reported a net income of 27.09M and revenue of 142.87M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.