PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSL vs. ASC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GSL vs. ASC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSL achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly lower than ASC's 70.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GSL has outperformed ASC with an annualized return of 18.00%, while ASC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.68% annualized return.


GSL

1D
1.13%
1M
0.79%
YTD
12.84%
6M
14.64%
1Y
57.39%
3Y*
36.38%
5Y*
21.72%
10Y*
18.00%

ASC

1D
2.87%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
70.76%
6M
67.60%
1Y
81.06%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
38.41%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSL vs. ASC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
12.84%73.47%18.09%28.97%-22.16%100.35%34.65%78.02%-46.55%-22.67%
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
70.76%-10.36%-8.18%5.81%326.33%3.36%-63.57%93.79%-41.63%8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GSL and ASC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013

0.28

Over the past year, GSL and ASC have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GSL:

$1.40B

ASC:

$717.46M

EPS

GSL:

$10.76

ASC:

$1.43

PE Ratio

GSL:

3.56

ASC:

12.27

PEG Ratio

GSL:

0.13

ASC:

0.02

PS Ratio

GSL:

1.79

ASC:

2.21

PB Ratio

GSL:

0.75

ASC:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSL:

$770.24M

ASC:

$324.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSL:

$409.23M

ASC:

$100.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

GSL:

$528.32M

ASC:

$105.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSL vs. ASC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSL
GSL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ASC
ASC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ASC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ASC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSL vs. ASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSLASCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.71

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

8.98

+1.06

GSL vs. ASC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the ASC Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSL and ASC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSL vs. ASC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSL drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than ASC's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSL and ASC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLASCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.26%

-80.11%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-21.96%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.82%

-61.41%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.50%

-61.41%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.50%

-71.21%

-15.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-16.39%

+8.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.65%

-38.91%

-19.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

9.06%

-3.33%

Volatility

GSL vs. ASC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) is 9.74%, while Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a volatility of 11.20%. This indicates that GSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLASCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

11.20%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.60%

27.22%

-6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

36.00%

-8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.91%

45.77%

-8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.60%

51.29%

+3.31%

Dividends

GSL vs. ASC - Dividend Comparison

GSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than ASC's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
3.70%2.83%8.89%8.16%0.00%0.00%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.41%4.80%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.26%6.06%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.69%

Financials

GSL vs. ASC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
198.08M
87.92M
(GSL) Total Revenue
(ASC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GSL vs. ASC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
53.7%
36.4%
Portfolio components
GSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.27M and revenue of 198.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.

ASC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a gross profit of 32.00M and revenue of 87.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

GSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.42M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

ASC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported an operating income of 25.58M and revenue of 87.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

GSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 93.83M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in a net margin of 47.4%.

ASC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a net income of 23.58M and revenue of 87.92M, resulting in a net margin of 26.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GSL and ASC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASC has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to GSL (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSL dropped -95.26% vs ASC's -80.11%.

ASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSL and ASC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer