ZGFIX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
ZGFIX is managed by Ninety One. It was launched on Dec 10, 2017. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
ZGFIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZGFIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | -10.36% | 18.56% | 7.83% | 19.38% | -18.04% | 18.58% | 16.72% | 28.13% | -4.07% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -6.18% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZGFIX having a -10.36% return and SCHG slightly lower at -10.59%.
ZGFIX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGFIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZGFIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ZGFIX
SCHG
ZGFIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGFIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 1.23 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.03 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 3.54 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGFIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.57 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.79 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGFIX and SCHG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZGFIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ZGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | 8.93% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.13% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
ZGFIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGFIX drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGFIX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGFIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -34.59% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -16.41% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -34.59% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.49% | -13.34% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -5.22% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 4.78% | -1.24% |
Volatility
ZGFIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) is 4.00%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that ZGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZGFIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 6.67% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 12.51% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 22.43% | -8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 22.32% | -7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 21.51% | -4.86% |