ZGFIX vs. QYLD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ZGFIX (American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both funds - ZGFIX is a Global Equities fund managed by American Beacon, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 5 years, ZGFIX returned 5.56%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for QYLD. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ZGFIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGFIX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.67% return.

ZGFIX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.88%
• 6M: 0.62%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 1Y: 9.58%
• 3Y*: 10.40%
• 5Y*: 5.56%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.58%

QYLD

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 5.88%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: 9.59%
• ALL TIME*: 8.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	$83.30M	$78.68M	$98.28M
ZGFIX American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ZGFIX American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund	0.98%	18.56%	7.83%	19.38%	-18.04%	18.58%	16.72%	28.13%	-4.07%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.67%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGFIX and QYLD is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between ZGFIX and QYLD has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ZGFIX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZGFIX

ZGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 12
ZGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ZGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ZGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ZGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ZGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 83
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZGFIX	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.73	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	2.48	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.35	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	3.38	-2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	15.70	-14.34

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGFIX and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGFIX drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGFIX and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGFIX	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.51%	-24.75%	-3.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.14%	-5.78%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-19.06%	+5.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.19%	-24.61%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-2.96%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-3.81%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.06%	1.24%	+3.82%

Volatility

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) is 4.37%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that ZGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGFIX	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	5.19%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	10.04%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	11.26%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	15.04%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	15.63%	+0.91%

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ZGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, less than QYLD's 11.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.89%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
ZGFIX American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund	7.92%	8.00%	0.23%	0.33%	0.37%	0.13%	0.38%	0.89%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZGFIX and QYLD in my portfolio?

ZGFIX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZGFIX or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to ZGFIX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZGFIX dropped -28.51% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.