ZGFIX vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
ZGFIX is managed by Ninety One. It was launched on Dec 10, 2017. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | -10.36% | 18.56% | 7.83% | 19.38% | -18.04% | 18.58% | 16.72% | 28.13% | -4.07% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 0.02% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -6.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGFIX achieves a -10.36% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 0.02% return.
ZGFIX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZGFIX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
ZGFIX
QYLD
ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGFIX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.00 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 1.61 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.31 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.51 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 9.98 | -9.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGFIX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.00 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.47 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGFIX and QYLD is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
ZGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, less than QYLD's 11.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | 8.93% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.13% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.92% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Drawdowns
ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGFIX drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGFIX and QYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGFIX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -24.75% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -10.84% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -24.61% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.49% | -2.41% | -10.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -3.89% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 1.64% | +1.90% |
Volatility
ZGFIX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) is 4.00%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that ZGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZGFIX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 4.90% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 7.48% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 16.42% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 14.84% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 15.51% | +1.14% |