YINN vs. ECNS
YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YINN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while ECNS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YINN returned -19.13%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for ECNS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ECNS.
Performance
YINN vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than ECNS's -4.50% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed ECNS with an annualized return of -19.13%, while ECNS has yielded a comparatively higher 1.77% annualized return.
YINN
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -10.06%
- YTD
- -28.25%
- 6M
- -32.42%
- 1Y
- -20.61%
- 3Y*
- -2.89%
- 5Y*
- -38.69%
- 10Y*
- -19.13%
ECNS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -7.71%
- 1Y
- 11.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- -6.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
YINN vs. ECNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -28.25% | 54.21% | 36.06% | -53.08% | -71.97% | -58.56% | -7.75% | 28.92% | -48.47% | 129.79% |
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -4.50% | 36.49% | 5.64% | -23.05% | -24.58% | 2.11% | 25.42% | 7.84% | -18.27% | 27.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between YINN and ECNS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.74 |
The correlation between YINN and ECNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
YINN vs. ECNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YINN
ECNS
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
YINN
ECNS
Consumer Cyclical
YINN
ECNS
Communication Services
YINN
ECNS
Energy
YINN
ECNS
Technology
YINN
ECNS
Basic Materials
YINN
ECNS
Industrials
YINN
ECNS
Healthcare
YINN
ECNS
Real Estate
YINN
ECNS
Consumer Defensive
YINN
ECNS
Utilities
YINN
ECNS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YINN vs. ECNS — Risk / Return Rank
YINN
ECNS
YINN vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YINN | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.11 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.63 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 1.22 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YINN | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 0.54 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | -0.24 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 | 0.07 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 0.02 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
YINN vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than ECNS's maximum drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and ECNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YINN | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.87% | -63.43% | -35.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.74% | -18.09% | -29.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.08% | -31.72% | -37.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.28% | -59.61% | -36.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | -63.43% | -35.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.46% | -38.53% | -58.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -29.39% | -39.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.39% | 9.21% | +15.18% |
Volatility
YINN vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 21.19% compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) at 5.65%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YINN | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.19% | 5.65% | +15.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.60% | 12.87% | +29.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.73% | 20.91% | +37.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.19% | 29.44% | +64.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.78% | 25.89% | +55.89% |
YINN vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ECNS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
YINN vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison
YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than ECNS's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.49% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.39% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YINN and ECNS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YINN has higher volatility (21.19%) compared to ECNS (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs ECNS's -63.43%.
On 10-year performance, ECNS leads with 1.77% vs -19.13% for YINN. On fees, ECNS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ECNS has performed better with a 1.77% return vs -19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ECNS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 1.39% for YINN.
YINN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ECNS is Asia Pacific Equities. YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.59% for ECNS.
ECNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YINN and ECNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer