YFYA vs. TAGS
YFYA (Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - YFYA is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Teucrium, while TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index. YFYA is actively managed, while TAGS is passively managed. Over the past year, YFYA returned 4.05% vs -3.66% for TAGS. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. YFYA charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
YFYA vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 2.65% return.
YFYA
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- -3.66%
- 3Y*
- -10.41%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- -1.93%
YFYA vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 1.62% | 2.52% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 2.65% | -11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between YFYA and TAGS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YFYA vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
YFYA
TAGS
YFYA vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YFYA | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.96 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | -0.38 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | -0.72 | +11.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YFYA vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YFYA | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -76.40% | +74.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.61% | -9.65% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -64.87% | +64.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -57.24% | +56.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 5.11% | -4.72% |
Volatility
YFYA vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 1.38%, while Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YFYA | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 3.30% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 10.33% | -6.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 12.64% | -8.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 16.33% | -12.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 18.00% | -14.42% |
YFYA vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
YFYA vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 5.17% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YFYA and TAGS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to YFYA (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs TAGS's -76.40%.
On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 4.05% vs -3.66% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 4.05% return vs -3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.
YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TAGS is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.21% for TAGS.
YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YFYA and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer