PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFYA vs. TAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFYA vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 2.65% return.


YFYA

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAGS

1D
-0.57%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
2.65%
6M
0.75%
1Y
-3.66%
3Y*
-10.41%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
-1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFYA vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
1.62%2.52%
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
2.65%-11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between YFYA and TAGS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFYA vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFYA
YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TAGS
TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFYA vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YFYATAGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.96

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

-0.38

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.43

-0.72

+11.15

YFYA vs. TAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the TAGS Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFYA and TAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YFYA vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and TAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFYATAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-76.40%

+74.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.61%

-9.65%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-64.87%

+64.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-57.24%

+56.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

5.11%

-4.72%

Volatility

YFYA vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 1.38%, while Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFYATAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

3.30%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

10.33%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

12.64%

-8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

16.33%

-12.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

18.00%

-14.42%

YFYA vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFYA vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison

YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
0.00%0.00%
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
5.17%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFYA and TAGS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAGS has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to YFYA (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs TAGS's -76.40%.

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 4.05% vs -3.66% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 4.05% return vs -3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.

YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TAGS is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.21% for TAGS.

YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFYA and TAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer