PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFYA vs. CXRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFYA vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -12.91% return.


YFYA

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.33%
YTD
1.93%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CXRN

1D
0.56%
1M
8.98%
6M
-4.70%
YTD
-12.91%
1Y
-10.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFYA vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
1.93%2.52%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
-12.91%-34.87%

Correlation

The correlation between YFYA and CXRN is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFYA vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFYA
YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFYA vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YFYACXRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.98

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

-0.32

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

-0.90

+11.13

YFYA vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFYA and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YFYA vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -53.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and CXRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFYACXRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-53.17%

+50.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.61%

-31.96%

+30.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-45.84%

+45.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-31.28%

+30.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

11.49%

-11.09%

Volatility

YFYA vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 0.46%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.36%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFYACXRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

15.36%

-14.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

29.82%

-26.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

36.85%

-33.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.53%

37.77%

-34.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.53%

37.77%

-34.24%

YFYA vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFYA vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than CXRN's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
2.47%3.30%0.13%
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
5.18%3.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFYA and CXRN have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXRN has higher volatility (15.36%) compared to YFYA (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs CXRN's -53.17%.

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 4.11% vs -10.34% for CXRN. On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 4.11% return vs -10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 2.47% for CXRN.

YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.95% for CXRN.

YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFYA and CXRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer