PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFYA vs. CXRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFYA vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -21.39% return.


YFYA

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CXRN

1D
-0.21%
1M
-21.84%
YTD
-21.39%
6M
-23.62%
1Y
-27.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFYA vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
1.67%2.52%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
-21.39%-34.87%

Correlation

The correlation between YFYA and CXRN is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFYA vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFYA
YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFYA vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YFYACXRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.89

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

-0.94

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

-2.21

+13.80

YFYA vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFYA and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YFYA vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -51.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and CXRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFYACXRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-51.11%

+48.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.61%

-28.97%

+27.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-51.11%

+50.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-30.67%

+30.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

12.34%

-11.95%

Volatility

YFYA vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 1.38%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFYACXRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

9.67%

-8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

27.05%

-23.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

36.39%

-32.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

36.73%

-33.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

36.73%

-33.14%

YFYA vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFYA vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than CXRN's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
2.87%3.30%0.13%
YFYA
Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF
5.17%3.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFYA and CXRN have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXRN has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to YFYA (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs CXRN's -51.11%.

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 4.47% vs -27.23% for CXRN. On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 4.47% return vs -27.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 2.87% for CXRN.

YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.95% for CXRN.

YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFYA and CXRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer