YFYA vs. GLCR
YFYA (Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF) and GLCR (GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YFYA is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Teucrium, while GLCR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Iceland Global Total Return Net Index. YFYA is actively managed, while GLCR is passively managed. Over the past year, YFYA returned 5.38% vs -7.32% for GLCR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YFYA charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLCR.
Performance
YFYA vs. GLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than GLCR's -10.49% return.
YFYA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLCR
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -10.49%
- 6M
- -3.88%
- 1Y
- -7.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YFYA vs. GLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 2.34% | 2.98% |
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF | -10.49% | 8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between YFYA and GLCR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.25 |
YFYA vs. GLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YFYA
GLCR
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
YFYA
GLCR
-
Consumer Cyclical
YFYA
GLCR
Communication Services
YFYA
GLCR
Healthcare
YFYA
GLCR
Industrials
YFYA
GLCR
Consumer Defensive
YFYA
GLCR
Financial Services
YFYA
GLCR
Utilities
YFYA
GLCR
-
Energy
YFYA
GLCR
-
Real Estate
YFYA
GLCR
Basic Materials
YFYA
GLCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YFYA vs. GLCR — Risk / Return Rank
YFYA
GLCR
YFYA vs. GLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YFYA | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | -0.45 | +1.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | -0.50 | +2.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.94 | +0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | -0.44 | +3.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.29 | -1.22 | +16.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YFYA | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | -0.45 | +1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | -0.15 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
YFYA vs. GLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum GLCR drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and GLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YFYA | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -16.79% | +14.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.61% | -16.79% | +15.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -16.79% | +16.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -4.54% | +4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 6.02% | -5.67% |
Volatility
YFYA vs. GLCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 1.14%, while GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YFYA | GLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 7.93% | -6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.35% | 13.27% | -9.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59% | 16.40% | -12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.59% | 18.62% | -15.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.59% | 18.62% | -15.03% |
YFYA vs. GLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than GLCR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
YFYA vs. GLCR - Dividend Comparison
YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than GLCR's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF | 1.08% | 0.97% |
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 5.14% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YFYA and GLCR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLCR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to YFYA (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs GLCR's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 5.38% vs -7.32% for GLCR. On fees, GLCR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 5.38% return vs -7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLCR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.
YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 1.08% for GLCR.
YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GLCR is Europe Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.95% for GLCR.
YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YFYA and GLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer