PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFYA vs. GLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFYA vs. GLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFYA achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than GLCR's -10.49% return.


YFYA

1D
0.41%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.59%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLCR

1D
-0.67%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-10.49%
6M
-3.88%
1Y
-7.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFYA vs. GLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YFYA and GLCR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.25

YFYA vs. GLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YFYA
GLCR

Technology

36.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
5.8%

Communication Services

11.1%
1.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
20.2%

Industrials

8.4%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
21.2%

Financial Services

5.1%
32.2%

Utilities

3.7%

-

Energy

1.9%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
7.6%

Basic Materials

1.4%
5.6%

Technology

YFYA
36.9%
GLCR

-

Consumer Cyclical

YFYA
12.2%
GLCR
5.8%

Communication Services

YFYA
11.1%
GLCR
1.5%

Healthcare

YFYA
9.2%
GLCR
20.2%

Industrials

YFYA
8.4%
GLCR
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

YFYA
8.3%
GLCR
21.2%

Financial Services

YFYA
5.1%
GLCR
32.2%

Utilities

YFYA
3.7%
GLCR

-

Energy

YFYA
1.9%
GLCR

-

Real Estate

YFYA
1.9%
GLCR
7.6%

Basic Materials

YFYA
1.4%
GLCR
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFYA vs. GLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFYA
YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GLCR
GLCR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFYA vs. GLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) and GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YFYAGLCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

-0.45

+1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

-0.50

+2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.94

+0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

-0.44

+3.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.29

-1.22

+16.51

YFYA vs. GLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the GLCR Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFYA and GLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YFYAGLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

-0.45

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

-0.15

+1.25

Drawdowns

YFYA vs. GLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFYA drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum GLCR drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFYA and GLCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFYAGLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-16.79%

+14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.61%

-16.79%

+15.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.79%

+16.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-4.54%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

6.02%

-5.67%

Volatility

YFYA vs. GLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) is 1.14%, while GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that YFYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFYAGLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

7.93%

-6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

13.27%

-9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

16.40%

-12.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

18.62%

-15.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

18.62%

-15.03%

YFYA vs. GLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFYA has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than GLCR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFYA vs. GLCR - Dividend Comparison

YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than GLCR's 1.08% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YFYA and GLCR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLCR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to YFYA (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFYA dropped -2.29% vs GLCR's -16.79%.

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 5.38% vs -7.32% for GLCR. On fees, GLCR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 5.38% return vs -7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLCR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 1.08% for GLCR.

YFYA is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GLCR is Europe Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.16% for YFYA and 0.95% for GLCR.

YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFYA and GLCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer