YCS vs. CNXT
YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YCS returned 13.63%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for CNXT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNXT.
Performance
YCS vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 42.18% return. Over the past 10 years, YCS has outperformed CNXT with an annualized return of 13.63%, while CNXT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
CNXT
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 40.51%
- 1Y
- 133.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
YCS vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 42.18% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between YCS and CNXT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014 | 0.00 |
The correlation between YCS and CNXT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (3 years) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YCS vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank
YCS
CNXT
YCS vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YCS | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.60 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 11.00 | -7.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 32.51 | -20.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YCS vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, smaller than the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and CNXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCS | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.56% | -68.98% | +19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -12.21% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.05% | -48.60% | +25.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.32% | -61.21% | +33.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.32% | -63.30% | +35.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -42.78% | +22.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 4.12% | -1.47% |
Volatility
YCS vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) is 2.22%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that YCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YCS | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 11.81% | -9.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.19% | 21.89% | -9.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 32.03% | -15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 35.48% | -14.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 31.76% | -12.80% |
YCS vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
YCS vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison
YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YCS and CNXT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXT has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs CNXT's -68.98%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.63% vs 7.89% for CNXT. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
CNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
YCS is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while CNXT is China Equities. YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for YCS and 0.65% for CNXT.
CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YCS and CNXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer