PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCS vs. TBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCS vs. TBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly higher than TBT's 1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, YCS has outperformed TBT with an annualized return of 13.63%, while TBT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.37% annualized return.


YCS

1D
0.40%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
13.63%

TBT

1D
1.47%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
1.57%
6M
2.39%
1Y
-0.97%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YCS vs. TBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.78%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%
TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
1.57%-1.45%27.66%-2.42%93.29%2.86%-37.93%-22.90%4.98%-17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between YCS and TBT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YCS vs. TBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TBT
TBT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YCS vs. TBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCSTBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.01

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

-0.07

+3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

-0.13

+11.99

YCS vs. TBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the TBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCS and TBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCS vs. TBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, smaller than the maximum TBT drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and TBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCSTBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.56%

-94.99%

+45.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-14.89%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

-33.83%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-33.83%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

-65.09%

+37.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-85.85%

+85.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-77.33%

+57.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

7.54%

-4.89%

Volatility

YCS vs. TBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) is 2.22%, while ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that YCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCSTBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

4.56%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

13.51%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

19.22%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

31.32%

-10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

28.80%

-9.84%

YCS vs. TBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TBT's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

YCS vs. TBT - Dividend Comparison

YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
2.94%3.21%4.64%4.98%0.42%0.00%0.32%2.12%0.99%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YCS and TBT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBT has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs TBT's -94.99%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.63% vs 2.37% for TBT. On fees, TBT is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBT is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

TBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

YCS is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while TBT is Inverse Bonds. YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while TBT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for YCS and 0.93% for TBT.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCS and TBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer