YBMN vs. QYLD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

YBMN (Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBMN is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. YBMN is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YBMN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

YBMN vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBMN achieves a -31.09% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 8.37% return.

YBMN

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -2.41%
• 6M: -40.29%
• YTD: -31.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 7.04%
• YTD: 8.37%
• 1Y: 21.04%
• 3Y*: 12.94%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBMN vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF	-31.09%	-6.74%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.37%	2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between YBMN and QYLD is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

YBMN vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 85
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBMN vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YBMN	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.25	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	21.84	—

Drawdowns

YBMN vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBMN drawdown since its inception was -57.03%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBMN and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBMN	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.03%	-24.75%	-32.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.68%	-2.33%	-47.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.44%	-3.81%	-30.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	YBMN	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.73%	10.73%	+68.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.73%	14.98%	+63.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.73%	15.59%	+63.14%

YBMN vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBMN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBMN vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

YBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.27%, more than QYLD's 11.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.63%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF	58.27%	6.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBMN and QYLD in my portfolio?

YBMN and QYLD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YBMN or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBMN or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for YBMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBMN or QYLD?

YBMN has the higher dividend yield at 58.27%, compared with 11.63% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between YBMN and QYLD?

YBMN is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for YBMN and 0.60% for QYLD.