YBMN vs. MST
YBMN (Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF) and MST (Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Defiance. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YBMN charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for MST.
Performance
YBMN vs. MST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBMN achieves a -23.25% return, which is significantly higher than MST's -45.07% return.
YBMN
- 1D
- 5.71%
- 1M
- -18.29%
- YTD
- -23.25%
- 6M
- -39.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MST
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -51.66%
- YTD
- -45.07%
- 6M
- -60.83%
- 1Y
- -92.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBMN vs. MST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF | -23.25% | -2.52% |
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | -45.07% | -18.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBMN and MST is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBMN vs. MST — Risk / Return Rank
YBMN
MST
YBMN vs. MST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBMN | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.74 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
YBMN vs. MST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBMN drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum MST drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBMN and MST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBMN | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -94.99% | +44.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -94.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.95% | -94.14% | +50.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -62.34% | +31.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 72.56% | — |
Volatility
YBMN vs. MST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBMN | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 100.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.44% | 126.48% | -46.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.44% | 123.71% | -43.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.44% | 123.71% | -43.27% |
YBMN vs. MST - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBMN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MST's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBMN vs. MST - Dividend Comparison
YBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.58%, less than MST's 818.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | 818.48% | 381.22% |
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF | 43.58% | 6.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBMN and MST have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YBMN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YBMN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.
MST has the higher dividend yield at 818.48%, compared with 43.58% for YBMN.
Their fees differ too: 0.85% for YBMN and 1.31% for MST.
Find the right allocation for YBMN and MST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer