PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBMN vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBMN vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBMN achieves a -27.39% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.


YBMN

1D
-5.25%
1M
-21.70%
YTD
-27.39%
6M
-38.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPO

1D
-1.12%
1M
6.63%
YTD
52.03%
6M
45.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBMN vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YBMN
Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF
-27.39%-2.52%
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
52.03%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between YBMN and AIPO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBMN vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YBMN vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBMNAIPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

2.36

-2.97

Drawdowns

YBMN vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBMN drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBMN and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBMNAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-17.31%

-33.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.98%

-1.12%

-45.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-4.38%

-26.58%

Volatility

YBMN vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBMNAIPODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.34%

34.09%

+46.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.34%

34.09%

+46.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.34%

34.09%

+46.25%

YBMN vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBMN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBMN vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

YBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.07%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YBMN and AIPO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for YBMN.

YBMN has the higher dividend yield at 46.07%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

YBMN is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIPO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for YBMN and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBMN and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer