YBMN vs. QQA
YBMN (Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YBMN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
YBMN vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBMN achieves a -23.25% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.23% return.
YBMN
- 1D
- 5.71%
- 1M
- -18.29%
- YTD
- -23.25%
- 6M
- -39.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 31.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBMN vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF | -23.25% | -2.52% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.23% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBMN and QQA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBMN vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
YBMN
QQA
YBMN vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF (YBMN) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBMN | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 1.17 | -1.70 |
Drawdowns
YBMN vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBMN drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBMN and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBMN | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -19.73% | -31.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.95% | -0.39% | -43.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -2.44% | -28.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility
YBMN vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBMN | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.44% | 12.59% | +67.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.44% | 18.25% | +62.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.44% | 18.25% | +62.19% |
YBMN vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBMN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBMN vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
YBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.58%, more than QQA's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.32% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
YBMN Defiance BMNR Option Income ETF | 43.58% | 6.80% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBMN and QQA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for YBMN.
YBMN has the higher dividend yield at 43.58%, compared with 9.32% for QQA.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for YBMN and 0.29% for QQA.
Find the right allocation for YBMN and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer