XTN vs. ROKT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XTN (SPDR S&P Transportation ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from State Street - XTN tracks the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index while ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XTN returned 6.50%/yr vs 22.27%/yr for ROKT. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XTN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ROKT.

Performance

XTN vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 19.69% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 29.61% return.

XTN

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -5.96%
• 6M: 13.81%
• YTD: 19.69%
• 1Y: 36.39%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: 6.50%
• 10Y*: 10.20%
• ALL TIME*: 10.72%

ROKT

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -7.17%
• 6M: 9.42%
• YTD: 29.61%
• 1Y: 64.65%
• 3Y*: 36.69%
• 5Y*: 22.27%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	$4.58M	$3.72M	$5.92M
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF	$3.22M	$3.69M	$6.00M

XTN vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF	19.69%	6.33%	4.86%	25.22%	-28.10%	33.68%	12.11%	21.85%	-11.57%
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	29.61%	50.56%	27.89%	14.41%	-0.81%	4.63%	7.99%	40.90%	-12.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XTN and ROKT is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2018	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between XTN and ROKT has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XTN vs. ROKT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTN	ROKT
Industrials	94.7%	67.8%
Technology	5.3%	20.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	7.6%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XTN vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTN

XTN Risk / Return Rank: 49
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ROKT

ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 78
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTN vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTN	ROKT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.96	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.58	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.77	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.31	8.61	-3.30

XTN vs. ROKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the ROKT Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTN and ROKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTN vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ROKT drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and ROKT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTN	ROKT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.77%	-43.16%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.28%	-22.83%	+5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.69%	-23.46%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.05%	-23.46%	-11.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.43%	-19.36%	+11.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.85%	-6.95%	-3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.18%	7.34%	-1.16%

Volatility

XTN vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) is 5.56%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that XTN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTN	ROKT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	8.71%	-3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.33%	26.53%	-4.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.71%	32.31%	-4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.86%	23.61%	+3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.16%	25.48%	+0.68%

XTN vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTN vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison

XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than ROKT's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF	0.28%	0.41%	0.57%	0.62%	0.54%	1.79%	0.48%	0.74%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF	0.67%	0.78%	0.93%	0.73%	1.04%	1.02%	0.75%	1.17%	0.98%	0.63%	0.66%	1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTN and ROKT in my portfolio?

XTN and ROKT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTN or ROKT?

ROKT has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to XTN (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs ROKT's -43.16%.

Which ETF is better, XTN or ROKT?

On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 22.27% vs 6.50% for XTN. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTN has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTN or ROKT?

Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 22.27% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTN or ROKT?

XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTN or ROKT?

XTN has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.28% for ROKT.

What is the main difference between XTN and ROKT?

XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.45% for ROKT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.